The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F23 and Xiaomi Poco F5 are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco F5 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, brighter display, and impressive battery life. While the Oppo F23 boasts fast charging, the Poco F5's overall performance and features justify its slight edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 15 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 18 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min (advertised) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Bold Gold | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | CPH2527 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Oppo F23
- Faster Charging (advertised)
- Potentially more stylish design
- Good value for money
- Less powerful chipset
- Dimmer display
- Potentially less impressive camera
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Significantly more powerful chipset
- Brighter and better display
- Excellent battery life
- Strong gaming performance
- Design might be less appealing to some
- Charging speed is comparable, not significantly faster
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 963 nits, offering significantly better visibility in sunlight compared to the F23. While the F23's display is adequate, the Poco F5's infinite contrast ratio promises richer colors and deeper blacks. Both likely use AMOLED panels, but the Poco F5's specs suggest a superior panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. However, the Poco F5's more powerful processor generally translates to better image processing and video recording capabilities. Expect improved low-light performance and dynamic range on the Poco F5. Both likely offer similar megapixel counts, but the Poco F5's image signal processor (ISP) will be superior.
Performance
Here, the Poco F5 dominates. Its Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the F23's Snapdragon 695. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance on the Poco F5. The Poco F5's CPU architecture (Cortex-X2 prime core) is also a key advantage.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 demonstrates exceptional battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 118 hours and an active use score of 11:52 hours. While the Oppo F23 has faster charging (67W vs 67W), the Poco F5's larger battery capacity and efficient chipset contribute to longer overall usage time.
Buying Guide
The Oppo F23 is a good choice for users prioritizing fast charging and a potentially more stylish design. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is ideal for gamers, power users, and anyone seeking top-tier performance and a vibrant display within a mid-range budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Poco F5 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset and superior cooling system.
❓ Does the Oppo F23 have a headphone jack?
Generally, Oppo F-series phones include a 3.5mm headphone jack. However, it's best to confirm this on the official Oppo website or retailer listing for the specific model.
❓ Which phone has faster charging?
Both phones offer 67W wired charging, but Oppo advertises a faster charging time (50% in 18 min) compared to the Poco F5 (100% in 46 min). Real-world results may vary.
