The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F23 and vivo Y100 are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both offer 5G connectivity and a range of features, but which one delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo F23 takes the lead with its significantly faster 67W charging and the Snapdragon 695 chipset, offering a smoother experience for many. However, the vivo Y100 boasts a slightly more powerful CPU and a potentially better camera system, making it a compelling alternative depending on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 15 | 2023, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 18 | Available. Released 2023, February 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 158.9 x 73.5 x 7.7 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP54, dust and water resistant
Color changing back panel color |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.38 inches, 98.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | - |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min (advertised) | 44W wired, 60% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Bold Gold | Metal Black, Twilight Gold, Pacific Blue |
| Models | CPH2527 | V2239 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 97.26 |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F23
- Faster 67W Charging
- Efficient Snapdragon 695 Chipset
- Sleek Design
- Good Value for Money
- Potentially Less Powerful Camera
- May lack some premium features
vivo Y100
- More Powerful Dimensity 900 Chipset
- Potentially Better Camera System
- Stylish Design
- Good Display Quality
- Slower 44W Charging
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. Screen size is likely similar, around 6.4-6.7 inches. We'll need to confirm exact resolutions and brightness levels for a definitive comparison.
Camera Comparison
The vivo Y100 is expected to have a more advanced camera system, potentially with a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing algorithms. Both phones likely offer a variety of shooting modes and features, but the vivo Y100 may edge out the Oppo F23 in image quality, especially in low light.
Performance
The vivo Y100's Dimensity 900 chipset generally outperforms the Snapdragon 695 in raw processing power, particularly in graphics-intensive tasks. However, the Snapdragon 695 is known for its efficiency. Real-world performance will depend on software optimization.
Battery Life
The Oppo F23's 67W charging is a major advantage, allowing for significantly faster charging times compared to the vivo Y100's 44W charging. Battery capacity is likely similar, around 4500-5000 mAh, so the Oppo F23 will likely regain more power in a shorter time.
Buying Guide
The Oppo F23 is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a reliable, efficient chipset for everyday tasks and light gaming. The vivo Y100 is a better choice for those who value camera performance and a slightly more powerful processor for demanding applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo Y100's Dimensity 900 chipset generally offers better gaming performance, especially for demanding titles. However, both phones should handle casual games well.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The Oppo F23 can charge from 0% to 50% in approximately 18 minutes with its 67W charger. The vivo Y100 takes around 30 minutes to reach 60% with its 44W charger.