The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F23 and vivo V27 are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features and attractive designs, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 edges out the Oppo F23 thanks to its brighter display, more powerful chipset (Dimensity 7200), and impressive endurance rating. While the Oppo F23 boasts 67W charging, the V27's overall package provides a more premium and smoother user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 15 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 18 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| | - | Color changing back panel color |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min (advertised) | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Bold Gold | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Models | CPH2527 | V2231, V2246 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 134h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 613641 (v9)
GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6)
GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F23
- Faster Charging (67W)
- Slightly More Affordable
- Good AMOLED Display (likely)
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Peak Brightness
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life
vivo V27
- Brighter Display (1055 nits)
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 7200)
- Excellent Battery Life (134h Endurance)
- Premium Design
- Slightly Slower Charging (66W)
- Potentially Higher Price
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured 1055 nits peak brightness significantly surpasses what we'd expect from the Oppo F23. While the Oppo F23 likely has a good quality AMOLED panel, the V27's brightness advantage makes it more visible in direct sunlight. The 'infinite' contrast ratio claim for the V27 suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors, further enhancing the viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. The vivo V27 likely benefits from its more powerful processor for image processing. We anticipate the V27 will offer better low-light performance and more consistent video recording. Both phones likely feature a main sensor around 64MP, but the V27's image processing algorithms will likely be superior.
Performance
The vivo V27's Mediatek Dimensity 7200 chipset (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Oppo F23's Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 7200's Cortex-A715 cores offer noticeably better performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Oppo F23 is still capable for everyday use, but the V27 provides a smoother and more responsive experience overall.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 134 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the Oppo F23's 67W charging is faster, the V27's larger battery capacity and efficient chipset likely result in longer real-world usage between charges.
Buying Guide
The Oppo F23 is a good choice for users prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more budget-friendly price point. The vivo V27 is ideal for those who value a vibrant display, strong performance for gaming and multitasking, and extended battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo V27 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 7200 chipset.
❓ Does the Oppo F23 charge faster?
Yes, the Oppo F23 has 67W charging, while the vivo V27 has 66W. However, battery capacity also plays a role, so charging time to full may not be drastically different.
