The Oppo F23 and vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The F23 aims for a balance of features and affordability, while the iQOO Neo 7 Pro prioritizes performance, particularly for gaming, at a slightly higher price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset offers a substantial leap over the Oppo F23’s Snapdragon 695, making it ideal for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the F23 remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 15 | 2023, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 18 | Available. Released 2023, July 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 197 g or 202 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min (advertised) | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Bold Gold | Fearless Flame, Dark Storm |
| Models | CPH2527 | I2217 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F23
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Underpowered chipset for gaming
- Limited performance headroom
vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Superior gaming capabilities
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat generation under sustained load
- May be overkill for basic users
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro, with its superior chipset, can render graphics and animations more fluidly. The Oppo F23’s Snapdragon 695 is adequate for everyday use, but will struggle with graphically intensive games at higher settings. We expect the iQOO Neo 7 Pro to have a higher peak brightness and potentially better color accuracy due to its higher-end processing capabilities.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the iQOO Neo 7 Pro, positioned as a performance-focused device, likely incorporates a more capable primary sensor and image signal processor (ISP) than the Oppo F23. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s ISP offers advanced features like improved low-light performance and faster image processing. While the Oppo F23 may suffice for casual photography, the iQOO Neo 7 Pro is expected to deliver superior image quality and versatility.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a flagship-level chipset, featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Oppo F23’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm), which utilizes Kryo 660 cores with lower clock speeds. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 translates to improved thermal efficiency, meaning the iQOO Neo 7 Pro can sustain peak performance for longer periods without significant throttling. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro will deliver a dramatically smoother experience in demanding applications and games.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s 120W charging is a game-changer, achieving a 50% charge in just 8 minutes. This is double the speed of the Oppo F23’s 67W charging (50% in 18 minutes). While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the iQOO Neo 7 Pro mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro allows for quicker top-ups, minimizing downtime and maximizing usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F23 if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks, social media, and light multimedia consumption, and value a more affordable price. Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro if you prioritize gaming performance, require significantly faster charging speeds, and are willing to invest a bit more for a smoother, more responsive experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the iQOO Neo 7 Pro get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is efficient, it can generate heat under sustained load. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro likely incorporates thermal management solutions (heat pipes, graphite sheets) to mitigate this, but some warmth is expected during prolonged gaming. The 4nm process helps, but it's not a magic bullet.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Oppo F23 still considered fast charging in 2024?
67W is still reasonably fast, but it's significantly slower than the 120W offered by the iQOO Neo 7 Pro. It will take considerably longer to fully charge the Oppo F23, which may be inconvenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Can the Oppo F23 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Oppo F23 can *run* these games, but likely at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a playable experience. The Snapdragon 695 is not designed for demanding gaming, and you may encounter stuttering or lag, especially in intense scenes.
❓ Does the iQOO Neo 7 Pro support high refresh rate displays for smoother scrolling and gaming?
While not explicitly stated in the provided data, iQOO Neo devices typically feature high refresh rate displays (90Hz or 120Hz). This, combined with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, will deliver a significantly smoother visual experience compared to the Oppo F23.
