The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F23 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The F23 leverages Qualcomm's Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Edge 40 Neo opts for MediaTek's Dimensity 7030. This comparison dives deep into the nuances of each device to determine which offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset and measured 1073 nits brightness provide a noticeable advantage over the Oppo F23's Snapdragon 695 and unspecified display capabilities, despite the F23's slightly faster advertised charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 15 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 18 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min (advertised) | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Bold Gold | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | CPH2527 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F23
- Faster advertised charging (50% in 18 mins)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Qualcomm's 5G modem for reliable connectivity
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Likely lower display brightness and quality
- Limited information on battery capacity
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- More powerful MediaTek Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Brighter display with 1073 nits peak brightness
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Slightly slower advertised charging (50% in 15 mins)
- Potentially higher price compared to Oppo F23
- Motorola's software update track record can be inconsistent
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors and a more immersive viewing experience. While the Oppo F23’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls short of this benchmark given its market positioning. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely benefits from a higher contrast ratio and potentially wider color gamut, enhancing image fidelity. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for optimal power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of specific sensor information for both devices. However, focusing on lens quality and processing is possible. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo likely prioritizes image processing for vibrant, social media-ready photos, a common Motorola trait. The Oppo F23’s camera system is likely tuned for a more natural color profile, aligning with Oppo’s general aesthetic. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the F23 is largely inconsequential; its small sensor size limits its usefulness. The Edge 40 Neo’s video capabilities are likely more robust, benefiting from the Dimensity 7030’s enhanced image signal processor (ISP).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo F23 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), featuring a dual-core Kryo 660 Gold setup clocked at 2.2 GHz alongside six Kryo 660 Silver cores at 1.7 GHz. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo, however, is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm), employing a more potent configuration with two Cortex-A78 cores at 2.5 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 7030 represent a significant architectural leap over the Kryo 660 Gold, offering superior single-core performance and improved efficiency. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the Edge 40 Neo. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 7030’s core design provides a clear performance edge.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use. While the Oppo F23’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s performance suggests a well-optimized power management system. Both devices support 68W wired charging, with the Oppo F23 claiming 50% charge in 18 minutes and the Edge 40 Neo in 15 minutes. This difference is marginal and unlikely to be noticeable in real-world usage. The Edge 40 Neo’s longer battery life offsets any slight charging speed disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F23 if you prioritize rapid charging – its 67W wired charging promises a 50% charge in 18 minutes, potentially fitting into quick top-up routines. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption and a more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming, backed by impressive battery endurance of 10:28h in active use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7030 is a relatively efficient chipset. While some heat generation is inevitable during demanding tasks like gaming, the 6nm process and Motorola’s thermal management system are generally effective at preventing significant throttling. User reports suggest the Edge 40 Neo maintains stable performance for extended gaming periods, though sustained high frame rates in graphically intensive titles may lead to some temperature increase.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Oppo F23 compatible with Power Delivery (PD) chargers from other devices?
Yes, the Oppo F23 supports Power Delivery (PD) charging, meaning you can utilize compatible PD chargers from other devices. However, to achieve the advertised 67W charging speed, it’s recommended to use the charger included in the box or a PD charger specifically rated for that wattage. Using a lower-wattage PD charger will still charge the phone, but at a slower rate.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 695's 5G performance compare to the Dimensity 7030's 5G capabilities in real-world scenarios?
Both chipsets support 5G connectivity, but the Dimensity 7030 generally offers more advanced 5G modem technology, potentially resulting in slightly faster download and upload speeds in areas with strong 5G coverage. However, the actual 5G performance will heavily depend on network conditions and carrier support, making the difference often negligible for most users.
