Google Pixel 7a vs Oppo F23: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset delivers significantly better performance and future-proofing, and its camera system is in a different league thanks to Google’s image processing. However, the Oppo F23’s incredibly fast 67W charging is a compelling advantage for those prioritizing convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo F23 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 15 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 18 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min (advertised) | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Bold Gold | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | CPH2527 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F23
- Superior camera performance thanks to Google’s image processing.
- Significantly faster and more capable processor (Tensor G2).
- Guaranteed software updates and feature drops from Google.
- Slower charging speed (18W).
- Potentially less battery life than Oppo F23 in heavy usage.
Google Pixel 7a
- Incredibly fast 67W wired charging.
- Smooth performance for everyday tasks.
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Significantly weaker processor compared to the Tensor G2.
- Inferior camera quality, especially in low light.
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, offering excellent visibility in direct sunlight, a metric the Oppo F23’s display specifications don’t directly address. While the Oppo F23’s panel details are absent, it’s likely a standard OLED, whereas the Pixel 7a’s display benefits from Google’s color calibration expertise. The absence of high refresh rate information for the Oppo F23 suggests it may be limited to 60Hz, while the Pixel 7a’s 90Hz panel provides a smoother scrolling experience.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a clear standout. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2’s image signal processor (ISP), elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall detail. The Oppo F23 likely relies more on hardware specifications, and while it may produce acceptable images in good lighting, it won’t match the Pixel 7a’s consistently high quality. The absence of details regarding OIS on the Oppo F23 suggests it may lack optical image stabilization, impacting low-light video and still photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, features a tri-cluster configuration with high-performance Cortex-X1 cores clocked at 2.85 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Oppo F23’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), which utilizes Kryo 660 cores peaking at 2.2 GHz. The Tensor G2’s architectural advantage and smaller fabrication node translate to significantly higher CPU and GPU performance, making the Pixel 7a far more capable for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Pixel 7a also benefits from potentially faster RAM speeds (likely LPDDR5x) compared to the Oppo F23, further enhancing responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life despite not having the largest capacity. However, the Oppo F23’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a 50% charge in just 18 minutes. The Pixel 7a’s 18W charging is considerably slower. While the Pixel 7a’s efficiency may offset the charging speed difference for some users, the Oppo F23 offers unparalleled convenience for those who need a quick top-up.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F23 if you prioritize extremely fast charging and a smooth, responsive experience for everyday tasks like social media and browsing. It’s ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value camera quality, long-term performance, and access to Google’s latest software features and AI capabilities. It’s the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those who want a phone that will remain capable for years to come.