Oppo's mid-range lineup offers compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The F21 Pro 5G and Reno7 Lite both boast attractive designs and capable features, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 Lite edges out the F21 Pro 5G thanks to its exceptional battery life and slightly brighter display. While both share the same chipset, the Reno7 Lite's endurance and screen quality provide a more consistently pleasing user experience. However, the F21 Pro 5G might offer slightly better value depending on pricing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 12 | 2022, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 21 | Available. Released 2022, June |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Rainbow Spectrum, Cosmic Black, Dawnlight Gold, Starlight Black | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Models | CPH2341, CPH2455 | CPH2343 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 125h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9)
GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F21 Pro 5G
- Potentially more compact design
- 5G Connectivity
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Fast Charging (33W)
- Lower battery life compared to Reno7 Lite
- Potentially less bright display
- Camera details are less clear
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- Exceptional battery life (125h endurance)
- Brighter display (657 nits)
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Fast Charging (33W)
- Design might be less distinctive
- Performance is comparable to F21 Pro 5G
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar 6.43-inch AMOLED displays, but the Reno7 Lite boasts a measured peak brightness of 657 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. The F21 Pro 5G's display is also excellent, but the Reno7 Lite has a slight edge in brightness and contrast (infinite nominal).
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key area. While both are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, detailed camera specs are missing. Generally, the Reno7 Lite is expected to have slightly better image processing due to Oppo's software optimizations. The F21 Pro 5G may have a unique selfie camera setup, which could be a selling point for some.
Performance
Powered by the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and Octa-core CPU, performance is largely comparable between the two devices. Expect smooth everyday usage and decent gaming performance, though demanding titles may require lower graphics settings. Differences in RAM and storage configurations (likely varying by region) could impact multitasking.
Battery Life
The Reno7 Lite shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 125 hours significantly surpasses the F21 Pro 5G. Both phones support 33W fast charging, promising a full charge in roughly 63 minutes, and feature reverse wired charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo F21 Pro 5G? Users prioritizing 5G connectivity and potentially a slightly more compact design. Who should buy the Oppo Reno7 Lite? Those seeking the absolute best battery life and a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption and outdoor use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Oppo Reno7 Lite has significantly better battery life with an endurance rating of 125 hours, compared to the F21 Pro 5G.
❓ Are the performance levels similar?
Yes, both phones use the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, so performance will be largely comparable for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.