The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F19s and Samsung Galaxy A54 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive review breaks down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 emerges as the clear winner, boasting a superior chipset, brighter display, and significantly better battery life. While the Oppo F19s offers faster charging, the A54's overall performance and features justify its slightly higher price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 27 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 27 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glowing Black, Glowing Gold | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | CPH2219, CPH2223 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F19s
- Faster Charging (33W)
- More Affordable
- Sleek Design
- Weaker Processor
- Less Bright Display
- Shorter Battery Life
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Superior Performance (Exynos 1380)
- Excellent Battery Life
- Brighter & Better Display
- Better Camera
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Slightly Higher Price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the display crown with its impressive 980 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio, offering a more vivid and immersive viewing experience. The Oppo F19s has a decent display, but lacks the A54's brightness and color accuracy. Both feature FHD+ resolution.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the Samsung Galaxy A54 generally produces better image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The A54's image processing is more refined, resulting in more natural-looking photos and videos. The F19s camera is adequate for casual use.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380 chipset (5nm) significantly outperforms the Oppo F19s' Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The A54 handles multitasking and demanding games with ease, while the F19s may show some lag under heavy load. The A54's Cortex-A78 cores provide a noticeable performance boost.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A54 dominates in battery life, consistently achieving over 11 hours of active use and an endurance rating of 119 hours. The Oppo F19s offers decent battery life, but falls short of the A54's longevity. The A54's efficient chipset contributes to its exceptional battery performance.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo F19s? Users prioritizing fast charging and a budget-friendly option. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A54? Those seeking a premium experience with excellent battery life, a vibrant display, and a more powerful processor for demanding tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380 chipset provides significantly better gaming performance than the Oppo F19s' Snapdragon 662.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A54 worth the extra cost?
Yes, if you prioritize performance, battery life, and a superior display, the Galaxy A54 is worth the investment. The Oppo F19s is a good budget option, but compromises on key features.
