The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F19s and Samsung Galaxy A32 are two popular contenders. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you determine which device is the right fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo F19s boasts faster charging and a slightly more powerful chipset, offering a smoother experience for everyday tasks. However, the Samsung Galaxy A32 shines with its exceptional battery life and brighter display, making it a strong contender for users prioritizing longevity and outdoor visibility. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 27 | 2021, February 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 27 | Available. Released 2021, February 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glowing Black, Glowing Gold | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Models | CPH2219, CPH2223 | SM-A325F, SM-A325F/DS, SM-A325M, SM-A325N |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 124.99 / £ 89.38 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.3 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1277 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F19s
- Faster Charging (33W)
- Slightly More Powerful Chipset (Snapdragon 662)
- Potentially Better Selfie Camera
- Lower Battery Life
- Likely IPS LCD Display (less vibrant than AMOLED)
- Less Established Brand Reputation (compared to Samsung)
Samsung Galaxy A32
- Exceptional Battery Life (119h Endurance Rating)
- Brighter Display (814 nits)
- Samsung Brand Reliability
- Likely AMOLED Display
- Slower Charging (15W)
- Less Powerful Chipset (Helio G80)
- Potentially Less Competitive Selfie Camera
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A32 takes the lead here. While the Oppo F19s has a decent display, the A32's measured 814 nits max brightness provides significantly better visibility in sunlight. The A32 also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent image quality, though this is a nominal value. Both phones likely feature similar resolution and panel technology (likely AMOLED for the A32 and IPS LCD for the F19s).
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the A32 likely has a slight edge due to Samsung's image processing expertise. While specific camera specs are not fully detailed, Samsung generally delivers reliable camera performance. The F19s likely focuses on selfie capabilities, potentially with a higher-resolution front-facing camera. A detailed camera comparison would require extensive testing.
Performance
The Oppo F19s' Snapdragon 662 chipset generally outperforms the Galaxy A32's Helio G80. The Snapdragon 662 is known for its efficiency and decent gaming capabilities. While both are mid-range chips, the F19s should offer a slightly smoother experience, especially when multitasking or running demanding apps. However, real-world performance differences might be subtle.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is the clear winner in the battery department. Its endurance rating of 119h is significantly higher than what we'd expect from the Oppo F19s. This translates to significantly longer usage between charges, making it ideal for heavy users.
Buying Guide
The Oppo F19s is ideal for users who value fast charging and a responsive performance for gaming and multitasking. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a better choice for those who prioritize long battery life, a vibrant display for media consumption, and the reliability of the Samsung brand.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo F19s likely offers a slightly better gaming experience due to its more powerful Snapdragon 662 chipset, although both are mid-range devices and won't handle demanding games at max settings.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A32 worth buying in 2024?
Yes, the Galaxy A32 remains a solid choice in 2024, especially if battery life and a vibrant display are your top priorities. However, newer models might offer better performance and features.
