The Oppo F19 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The F19, built around the Snapdragon 662, aims for a balance of affordability and usability. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G, however, pushes the envelope with its 67W charging and newer Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, targeting users who prioritize speed and connectivity.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Oppo F19’s Snapdragon 662, and the significantly faster 67W charging dramatically improves the user experience. While the F19 remains a viable option for basic tasks, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ provides a more future-proof and responsive experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 01 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 08 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prism Black, Midnight Blue | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | CHP2219, CPH2219 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 0.92 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F19
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Snapdragon 662 for basic tasks
- Simple and user-friendly interface (likely)
- Slower Snapdragon 662 processor
- Significantly slower 33W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster Snapdragon 695 5G processor
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Potentially higher price
- More powerful chipset may consume more battery during heavy use
- Software bloatware (typical of Xiaomi)
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided for the Oppo F19, it's likely to feature a standard LCD panel. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) benefits from a more modern manufacturing process with its Snapdragon 695 (6nm) chipset, potentially allowing for a more efficient display driver. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+’s display technology is unknown, but the chipset’s efficiency suggests better power management for the screen. This translates to potentially longer battery life during video playback or gaming.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) benefits from the overall processing power of the Snapdragon 695, which includes an improved Image Signal Processor (ISP). This ISP will likely deliver better image processing capabilities, resulting in sharper images and more accurate colors. The Oppo F19’s Snapdragon 662 ISP is older and less capable. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+’s chipset also supports more advanced camera features, such as improved low-light performance and faster autofocus.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), featuring a more modern architecture with 2x 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x 1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. This contrasts with the Oppo F19’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm) with its 4x 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 4x 1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver configuration. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 offers improved power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning sustained performance will be higher, especially during demanding tasks. The higher clock speeds on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+’s performance cores further contribute to a snappier user experience.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) truly shines with its 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes (advertised). This is a significant advantage over the Oppo F19’s 33W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 54%. While battery capacity isn't specified for either device, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery, providing more usable uptime throughout the day. The inclusion of PD3.0 and QC3 support on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ also adds to its charging versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 if you need a reliable, basic smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and prioritize a lower initial cost. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prefer faster performance for gaming and multitasking, demand significantly quicker charging speeds, and want 5G connectivity for future network compatibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset for gaming. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should handle PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 6nm process also helps with thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) compared to the Oppo F19’s 33W charging in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) can reach 50% charge in approximately 15 minutes, while the Oppo F19 takes around 30 minutes to reach 54%. A full charge on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ takes 42 minutes (advertised), compared to a significantly longer time on the Oppo F19. This means less time tethered to a charger and more time using your phone.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
While specific carrier aggregation support varies by region and carrier, the Snapdragon 695 generally supports carrier aggregation, which can significantly improve 5G download and upload speeds in areas with good 5G coverage. Check with your carrier for specific compatibility details.
