The sub-$300 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Oppo F19, with its focus on sleek design and efficient power usage, clashes with the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G, which prioritizes a larger battery and faster charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right device for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better buy. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Oppo F19’s Snapdragon 662. Coupled with significantly faster 67W charging, the Poco X4 Pro provides a more future-proof and convenient experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 01 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 08 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prism Black, Midnight Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | CHP2219, CPH2219 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | 0.92 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F19
- Potentially more compact and lightweight design.
- May offer slightly better color accuracy in display.
- Sleek aesthetic (subjective).
- Older Snapdragon 662 chipset offers lower performance.
- Slower 33W charging.
- Less efficient 11nm manufacturing process.
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset.
- Significantly faster 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support.
- More efficient 6nm manufacturing process.
- Potentially larger and heavier design.
- May not prioritize color accuracy as much as Oppo.
- Software experience may be less refined (subjective).
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting standard IPS LCD panels. However, detailed specifications like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s positioning, it’s likely to have a higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. The Oppo F19’s display is likely tuned for color accuracy, but without specific data, it’s difficult to confirm. Bezels are likely comparable given the price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having photo and video capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Poco X4 Pro 5G likely features a more capable main sensor. The Oppo F19 may focus on software-based image enhancements, but the Poco’s hardware advantage is likely to yield better results in low-light conditions. We can assume both phones include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but the quality will vary.
Performance
The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Oppo F19’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially sustained performance during demanding tasks. The CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver in the Poco versus 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver in the Oppo – favors the Poco, particularly in multi-threaded applications. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the more modern chipset in the Poco X4 Pro 5G will benefit from faster memory access speeds.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging is a game-changer. Achieving 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes is significantly faster than the Oppo F19’s 33W charging, which reaches 54% in 30 minutes. This faster charging mitigates any potential battery life differences, offering greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 if you prioritize a lighter, more compact phone and are content with basic performance for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and social media. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, a longer-lasting battery, and significantly quicker charging speeds – all at a similar price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 695, built on a 6nm process, is more thermally efficient than the Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo F19. While some heat generation is inevitable during gaming, the Poco X4 Pro 5G is less likely to experience significant throttling, allowing for more sustained performance. However, prolonged, high-intensity gaming will still generate heat.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G safe for the battery's long-term health?
Yes, the Poco X4 Pro 5G utilizes intelligent charging algorithms that manage the charging process to minimize battery degradation. While faster charging generates more heat, the phone's power management system regulates the charging speed to protect the battery's longevity. The inclusion of PD3.0 and QC3 further ensures safe and efficient charging.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Poco X4 Pro 5G and the Oppo F19?
The Poco X4 Pro 5G runs Xiaomi’s MIUI, known for its extensive customization options and feature set, but also criticized for occasional bloatware. The Oppo F19 uses ColorOS, which generally offers a cleaner and more streamlined experience. Preference is subjective, but ColorOS is often considered more user-friendly for those new to Android.
