The Oppo F19 and vivo V23 5G represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a 5G experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this, primarily through chipset selection and charging technology. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and faster charging, the vivo V23 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Oppo F19’s Snapdragon 662, and the 44W charging is noticeably quicker. However, the F19 remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 7, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 01 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 08 | Available. Released 2022, January 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 157.2 x 72.4 x 7.4 or 7.6 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 179 g or 181 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | Panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi 6 (market dependent), dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 44W wired, 68% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prism Black, Midnight Blue | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black |
| Models | CHP2219, CPH2219 | V2130, V2303 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 280 EUR |
| SAR | 0.92 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 103h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 406498 (v8), 476058 (v9)
GeekBench: 8421 (v4.4), 2140 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F19
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Snapdragon 662 for basic tasks
- Decent battery endurance
- Significantly slower performance compared to the V23 5G
- Slower 33W charging
- Less detailed display specifications
vivo V23 5G
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset
- Faster 44W charging
- Brighter display with infinite contrast ratio
- Likely higher price tag
- Potential for more heat under sustained load (though Dimensity 920 is efficient)
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The vivo V23 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 629 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo F19. While both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on brand trends), the V23 5G’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. The V23 5G also claims an infinite contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED technology, providing deep blacks and vibrant colors. The F19’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a more standard AMOLED experience without the same emphasis on peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the V23 5G’s positioning suggests a more advanced camera system, potentially with larger sensors and improved image processing. The Oppo F19 likely relies on a more basic camera setup geared towards casual photography. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The vivo V23 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo F19’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The Dimensity 920 features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A78 cores alongside Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Snapdragon 662’s Kryo 260 cores. This translates to a significant performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 920 also contributes to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling compared to the Snapdragon 662’s 11nm process.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo F19 and vivo V23 5G achieve an endurance rating of 103 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the V23 5G’s 44W wired charging significantly outperforms the F19’s 33W charging, achieving 68% charge in 30 minutes versus 54% for the F19. This faster charging speed is a crucial advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 if you need a reliable, everyday smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media, and prioritize a lower price point. Buy the vivo V23 5G if you prefer a smoother experience with more demanding apps, enjoy mobile gaming, and value faster charging speeds for minimal downtime. The V23 5G is the better choice for users who want a phone that can keep up with a more active digital lifestyle.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 920 in the vivo V23 5G get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 920 is a powerful chip, its 6nm process node is relatively efficient. However, sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. The V23 5G’s thermal management system should prevent significant throttling, but users may experience some warmth during prolonged gameplay. It's less prone to overheating than older 7nm chips.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo F19 slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
The 33W charging on the Oppo F19 is slower than the 44W on the V23 5G, taking longer to reach a full charge. While not exceptionally slow, it may be inconvenient for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery. The 54% charge in 30 minutes is adequate for a quick boost, but won't provide a full charge in a short timeframe.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 662 handle multitasking compared to the Dimensity 920?
The Dimensity 920’s more modern CPU architecture and higher processing power provide a significantly smoother multitasking experience. The Snapdragon 662 can handle basic multitasking, but may exhibit lag or slowdowns when running multiple demanding apps simultaneously. The V23 5G is better suited for users who frequently switch between apps or run resource-intensive applications.
