The Oppo F19 and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a solid user experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on performance, display quality, camera capabilities, and battery life to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset delivers a substantially faster and more responsive experience than the Oppo F19’s Snapdragon 662, making it better suited for gaming and demanding applications. While the Oppo F19 offers faster wired charging, the A52s 5G’s overall package is more compelling.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 01 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 08 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prism Black, Midnight Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | CHP2219, CPH2219 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 220 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | 0.92 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F19
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Lightweight design (assumed based on market positioning)
- Significantly weaker Snapdragon 662 processor
- Likely less vibrant display
- Potentially limited camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Brighter 800 nit display
- More versatile camera system (likely)
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Potentially higher price
- May be slightly heavier
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo F19. This makes the A52s 5G far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the higher brightness of the A52s 5G contributes to a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. Details regarding panel technology (e.g., AMOLED vs. LCD) and refresh rate are missing for the F19, but the A52s 5G’s superior brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the A52s 5G’s chipset provides more processing power for image processing algorithms, potentially leading to better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Oppo F19’s camera system likely focuses on affordability, while the A52s 5G aims for a more balanced approach between price and performance. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the A52s 5G, if equipped, would further enhance its camera capabilities.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the Oppo F19’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 778G features a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – compared to the F19’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver configuration. The 6nm process node of the 778G also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the A52s 5G.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Oppo F19 features 33W wired charging, allowing it to reach 54% charge in 30 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G supports 25W wired charging, which is slower. This means the F19 can top up its battery more quickly, which is beneficial for users who frequently need a quick charge. Despite the slower charging, the A52s 5G’s more efficient chipset may offset this difference in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 if you prioritize fast charging and a lighter price tag, and your smartphone usage is primarily focused on basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value performance, a brighter display, and a more versatile camera system, and you frequently engage in gaming, video streaming, or photography.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is built on a 6nm process, which offers excellent thermal efficiency. While it will get warm during prolonged gaming, the A52s 5G is designed to manage heat effectively and prevent significant performance throttling. It's less prone to overheating than the Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo F19 under similar loads.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo F19 a game-changer, or is the 25W on the A52s 5G sufficient?
While 33W is faster, the difference isn't massive. The Oppo F19 gains a noticeable boost in quick top-up times, reaching 54% in 30 minutes. However, the A52s 5G’s more efficient chipset means you may not need to charge as frequently, mitigating the slower charging speed. For overnight charging, the difference is negligible.
❓ How does the camera performance differ between these two phones in low-light conditions?
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is likely to perform better in low-light scenarios due to its more powerful Snapdragon 778G processor, which enables more sophisticated image processing algorithms. This results in less noise, better detail, and more accurate colors in challenging lighting conditions.
