The Oppo F19 and Realme 9 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a 5G experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches. The F19 relies on the established Snapdragon 662, while the 9 Pro steps up to the newer, more efficient Snapdragon 695. This comparison will dissect the key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 9 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a significant performance uplift and improved efficiency compared to the Oppo F19’s Snapdragon 662. While both charge at 33W and share an identical endurance rating, the 9 Pro’s superior processing power justifies the potential price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 01 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 08 | Available. Released 2022, February 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prism Black, Midnight Blue | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue |
| Models | CHP2219, CPH2219 | RMX3471, RMX3472 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 248.86 |
| SAR | 0.92 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 134h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1601:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 401894 (v9)
GeekBench: 2020 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F19
- Proven Snapdragon 662 chipset offers reliable performance for basic tasks.
- Competitive price point makes it accessible to budget-conscious buyers.
- 33W fast charging provides quick top-ups.
- Older Snapdragon 662 chipset is less efficient and powerful than the 695.
- May struggle with demanding apps and games.
- Limited future-proofing compared to the 5G-enabled Realme 9 Pro.
Realme 9 Pro
- Snapdragon 695 5G chipset delivers significantly improved performance and efficiency.
- Higher peak display brightness enhances outdoor visibility.
- 5G connectivity provides faster data speeds and future-proofs the device.
- May be slightly more expensive than the Oppo F19.
- Similar battery endurance rating despite the more efficient chipset – heavy users will benefit more.
- Camera details are lacking, making a definitive assessment difficult.
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo F19 and Realme 9 Pro feature displays with a 1601:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the Realme 9 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 567 nits, which will translate to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While neither manufacturer specifies panel technology (LCD vs AMOLED), the Realme 9 Pro’s higher brightness gives it a clear advantage in real-world usability. Bezels are likely comparable given the similar price points, and color accuracy is an area where further testing would be needed to differentiate.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing. Given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both utilize a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a depth or macro lens. However, without knowing the megapixel counts or sensor sizes, a direct comparison is difficult. The Realme 9 Pro’s image processing algorithms, benefiting from the more powerful chipset, are likely to deliver superior results, particularly in low-light conditions. We can assume the Realme 9 Pro will offer better video stabilization and potentially support higher resolution video recording.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 9 Pro’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo F19’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 6nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency, leading to less heat generation and potentially reduced throttling during sustained workloads. The CPU configuration also favors the 9 Pro, with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores versus the F19’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores. This translates to faster app launch times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the 695’s improved architecture will maximize its effectiveness.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Oppo F19 and Realme 9 Pro share an endurance rating of 134 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the chipset differences. Both support 33W wired charging, achieving 54% charge in 30 minutes. The Snapdragon 695’s improved efficiency in the Realme 9 Pro *could* offset the power draw of its more powerful CPU, contributing to the similar endurance rating. However, users who frequently engage in demanding tasks will likely see a more noticeable battery life advantage with the Realme 9 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 if you prioritize a proven, reliable chipset for everyday tasks and are on a very tight budget. It’s a solid option for basic smartphone use like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Realme 9 Pro if you want a smoother experience with more demanding apps, occasional gaming, and future-proofing with 5G connectivity. The 695 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost for a relatively small price premium.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Realme 9 Pro get noticeably warmer than the Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo F19 during extended gaming sessions?
While both chipsets are designed for efficiency, the Snapdragon 695 is built on a 6nm process, which inherently generates less heat than the 11nm process used by the Snapdragon 662. Therefore, the Realme 9 Pro is likely to maintain cooler temperatures during prolonged gaming, reducing the risk of performance throttling.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Realme 9 Pro actually useful if I don't have 5G coverage in my area?
Even without immediate 5G access, the Realme 9 Pro’s 5G modem offers future-proofing. As 5G networks expand, you’ll be ready to take advantage of faster data speeds. Additionally, 5G modems often include improvements to 4G connectivity, potentially resulting in slightly better performance even on older networks.
❓ How much of a difference will I see in app loading times between the Oppo F19 and the Realme 9 Pro?
You should notice a significant difference in app loading times. The Realme 9 Pro’s Snapdragon 695, with its faster CPU cores and improved architecture, will launch apps noticeably quicker than the Oppo F19’s Snapdragon 662. This difference will be particularly apparent with larger, more complex applications.
