The Oppo F19 and Motorola Moto G71s represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their underlying hardware. This comparison dissects the key differences, focusing on the impact of their respective chipsets and charging capabilities on real-world performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G71s emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Oppo F19’s Snapdragon 662, especially in sustained workloads. While both offer 33W charging, the G71s’ more modern chipset offers a better long-term value proposition.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 01 | 2022, May 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 08 | Available. Released 2022, June 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2440 pixels (~404 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 121˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prism Black, Midnight Blue | Black, White |
| Models | CHP2219, CPH2219 | - |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | 0.92 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F19
- Established Brand Reputation
- Fast 33W Charging
- Potentially Lower Price (depending on region)
- Older Snapdragon 662 Chipset
- Less Efficient 11nm Process
- Potentially Lower Performance in Demanding Tasks
Motorola Moto G71s
- More Powerful Snapdragon 695 5G
- More Efficient 6nm Process
- Improved 5G Connectivity
- Better Sustained Performance
- Motorola’s Software Update History (can be slower)
- Potentially Slightly Higher Price
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Motorola provide display specifications beyond the basic panel type. Assuming both utilize IPS LCDs (typical for this price bracket), the real differentiator lies in the processing power driving them. The Snapdragon 695 in the Moto G71s will offer a smoother experience when scrolling and navigating the UI, even if the resolution and refresh rate are identical. Without specific brightness or color gamut data, it's difficult to declare a clear winner on display quality alone.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the chipset plays a role in image processing speed. The Snapdragon 695’s improved ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Moto G71s will likely result in faster image capture and potentially better low-light performance compared to the F19. The quality of the main sensor and lens aperture are crucial, but the 695 provides a processing advantage. We can assume both phones will include a standard set of cameras, with the G71s potentially offering more advanced features due to its more capable chipset.
Performance
The core difference between these phones is the chipset. The Motorola Moto G71s boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), featuring a 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver configuration. This is a significant upgrade over the Oppo F19’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm) with its 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver cores. The 6nm process node of the 695 translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, meaning the G71s can sustain peak performance for longer periods. The higher clock speeds on the prime cores of the 695 also contribute to faster app launch times and smoother multitasking. This benefits users who frequently switch between applications or engage in light gaming.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 33W wired charging, with the Oppo F19 claiming 54% charge in 30 minutes. While the Moto G71s doesn’t explicitly state this, 33W charging typically delivers similar results. The Snapdragon 695’s 6nm efficiency gives the Moto G71s an edge in battery life. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the more efficient chipset will allow the G71s to extract more usage from a given battery size, making it the better choice for users who prioritize all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 if you prioritize a slightly more established brand reputation and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Motorola Moto G71s if you want a phone capable of handling more demanding apps, occasional gaming, and benefit from the improved efficiency and 5G capabilities of the Snapdragon 695.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G71s handle graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 in the Moto G71s is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a smooth experience. The Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo F19 will struggle with higher settings and may exhibit noticeable frame drops during intense gameplay.
❓ How much faster is the 5G connectivity on the Moto G71s compared to the F19?
Both phones support 5G, but the Snapdragon 695 in the Moto G71s offers a more advanced 5G modem with wider band support. This translates to potentially faster and more reliable 5G connections, especially in areas with limited 5G coverage. The F19’s 5G modem is older and may not support all 5G bands.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Moto G71s get significantly hotter than the Snapdragon 662 during prolonged use?
Despite being more powerful, the Snapdragon 695’s 6nm process is more thermally efficient than the Snapdragon 662’s 11nm process. This means the Moto G71s is less likely to overheat and experience performance throttling during extended gaming sessions or demanding tasks.
