The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G and Xiaomi Poco F3 GT represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both leverage MediaTek’s Dimensity series, they target slightly different priorities – the F19 Pro+ 5G emphasizes a balanced experience, while the Poco F3 GT aggressively prioritizes gaming performance. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 1200 chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the F19 Pro+ 5G’s Dimensity 800U, and the 67W charging is noticeably faster. While the Oppo offers a slightly more refined aesthetic, the Poco’s raw power and faster charging justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 08 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 100% in 48 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | CPH2213 | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G
- Sleek and refined design
- Balanced all-around performance
- Competitively priced
- Less powerful chipset than the Poco F3 GT
- Slower charging speed
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Significantly faster Dimensity 1200 chipset
- 67W fast charging with PD3.0/QC3
- Optimized for gaming
- More aggressive, gamer-focused design
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a top-tier display, but both are adequate for their price point. While specific display specs (resolution, refresh rate) aren't provided, the focus here is on the underlying processing power impacting the user experience. The Dimensity 1200 in the Poco F3 GT will handle higher refresh rates and more demanding graphical tasks with greater ease, resulting in smoother animations and a more responsive feel. The F19 Pro+ 5G, with its less powerful chipset, may exhibit slight stuttering in graphically intensive applications.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset plays a role in image processing speed. The Dimensity 1200’s superior ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Poco F3 GT will likely result in faster image capture and processing, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While both phones likely feature similar sensor configurations within their respective price brackets, the Poco’s processing power gives it an edge in computational photography. We can assume both phones will have a primary camera, ultrawide, and depth sensor, but the Poco will likely handle HDR and night mode processing more effectively.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F3 GT’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G’s Dimensity 800U (7nm). The Dimensity 1200 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core alongside 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, compared to the F19 Pro+ 5G’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to approximately 25-30% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. Furthermore, the 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1200 offers improved power efficiency, potentially leading to better sustained performance during prolonged gaming sessions. The Poco F3 GT is the clear winner for users prioritizing performance.
Battery Life
The Poco F3 GT’s 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support is a significant advantage, achieving a 100% charge in just 42 minutes. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G’s 50W charging, while respectable, takes 48 minutes to fully charge. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Poco F3 GT mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. Users who frequently top up their phones will greatly benefit from the Poco’s speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G if you prioritize a sleek design and a balanced all-around experience without demanding the absolute highest gaming performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you are a mobile gamer, frequently multitask, or value the fastest possible charging speeds and are willing to accept a more gamer-centric aesthetic.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco F3 GT’s Dimensity 1200 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chipset, but Xiaomi likely implemented thermal management solutions (heat pipes, graphite sheets) to mitigate overheating. While some heat is expected during prolonged gaming, the 6nm process node and optimized cooling should prevent significant throttling and maintain consistent performance.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 50W and 67W really noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the 17W difference is quite noticeable. The Poco F3 GT’s 67W charging can add a significant amount of battery life in just a few minutes, making it ideal for users who need a quick top-up before heading out. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G’s 50W is still fast, but the Poco offers a more convenient charging experience.
❓ Does the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G have enough processing power for demanding apps like video editing?
The Dimensity 800U is capable of handling basic video editing tasks, but it may struggle with complex projects or high-resolution footage. The Poco F3 GT’s Dimensity 1200 is significantly better suited for demanding applications like video editing due to its superior CPU and GPU performance.
❓ Which phone is better for running multiple apps simultaneously (multitasking)?
The Poco F3 GT is the clear winner for multitasking. The Dimensity 1200’s more powerful CPU and potentially larger RAM capacity (though not specified) allow it to handle multiple apps running in the background with greater ease and responsiveness.
