Both the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G and the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G target the competitive mid-range 5G market, but they take different approaches. The Mi 11 Lite 5G prioritizes a sleek design and efficient Snapdragon chipset, while the F19 Pro+ 5G leans towards faster charging and a slightly different processor architecture. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 780G, built on a more efficient 5nm process, offers a better balance of performance and power consumption, complemented by a brighter display. While the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G boasts faster 50W charging, the Mi 11 Lite’s overall package is more refined.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 08 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, April 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 159 g (5.61 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.90 GHz Kryo 670) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7350-AB Snapdragon 780G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 642 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 100% in 48 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue | Truffle Black, Mint Green, Citrus Yellow |
| Models | CPH2213 | M2101K9G, M2101K9C, M2101K9R |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 106h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-23.6 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 465534 (v8) | 522490 (v9)
GeekBench: 2909 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G
- Faster 50W charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially better thermal management due to Dimensity 800U
- Competitive price point
- Less efficient 7nm chipset compared to Snapdragon 780G
- Limited display information hinders comparison
- Potentially lower sustained performance in demanding tasks
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
- More efficient Snapdragon 780G (5nm) for better battery life
- Brighter display (846 nits) for outdoor visibility
- Superior CPU architecture for smoother performance
- Slower 33W charging compared to Oppo F19 Pro+
- May require a separate fast charger for optimal speeds
- Endurance rating is the same as the Oppo
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 846 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a common pain point with many mid-range phones. While the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G’s display specs aren’t provided, the Mi 11 Lite’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a strong AMOLED panel. The lack of detailed display information for the Oppo makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Mi 11 Lite’s brightness is a clear win for users who spend time outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but without specific sensor details, a definitive comparison is challenging. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture on the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G makes it difficult to assess its low-light performance. The Mi 11 Lite 5G likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), known for its excellent image processing. We can assume both phones will offer a standard set of camera modes, but the Mi 11 Lite 5G’s processor advantage suggests potentially faster image processing and better dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G (5nm), while the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G features the MediaTek Dimensity 800U (7nm). The Snapdragon 780G’s 5nm fabrication process is a key advantage, offering superior power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 7nm Dimensity 800U. While both CPUs have a peak clock speed of 2.4 GHz, the Snapdragon 780G’s Kryo 670 cores are architecturally more advanced, resulting in better sustained performance. This translates to smoother multitasking and a more responsive gaming experience on the Mi 11 Lite 5G.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 106 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing charging speeds. However, the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G’s 50W wired charging is significantly faster than the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s 33W charging, achieving a full charge in just 48 minutes. The Mi 11 Lite 5G supports PD3.0 and QC4, offering broader compatibility with fast chargers, but it won’t match the F19 Pro+ 5G’s peak charging speed. The faster charging of the Oppo is a boon for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and frequently need to top up your battery throughout the day. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G if you value a more efficient processor, a brighter and more usable display in sunlight, and a generally smoother user experience, even during extended use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 800U in the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 800U is capable of running Genshin Impact, but you may need to lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 780G in the Mi 11 Lite 5G will generally provide a smoother experience at higher settings due to its more efficient architecture and GPU.
❓ How much does the 33W charging on the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G impact daily usability compared to the Oppo's 50W?
While 50W is faster, 33W is still reasonably quick. The Mi 11 Lite 5G can still gain a significant charge in a short period, and the efficiency of the Snapdragon 780G means you may not need to charge as frequently in the first place. The difference is more noticeable for users who consistently drain their battery and need a rapid top-up.
❓ Is the camera on either phone suitable for serious photography, or are they better suited for casual snapshots?
Both phones are geared towards casual photography. While they can capture decent images in good lighting conditions, they lack the advanced features and sensor sizes found in flagship devices. The Mi 11 Lite 5G's image processing may offer a slight edge, but neither phone will replace a dedicated camera.
