The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this goal, primarily through chipset choice and charging implementation. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G emerges as the stronger overall choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and better thermal management, while the 800 nits display offers superior visibility. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G’s faster 50W charging is a compelling counterpoint, but doesn't fully offset the performance gap.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 08 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 100% in 48 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | CPH2213 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 300 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G
- Extremely fast 50W charging (48 minutes to full)
- Potentially competitive price point
- 5G connectivity
- Less efficient Dimensity 800U chipset
- Likely lower display brightness
- Limited information on camera sensor specs
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Brighter 800 nit display for better outdoor visibility
- Samsung’s refined image processing
- Slower 25W charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Similar battery endurance to Oppo
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 800 nits. This translates to excellent outdoor visibility, a common pain point for smartphone users. While the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls short of this brightness level. The A52s 5G’s 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a strong AMOLED panel, delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors. The lack of information on the F19 Pro+'s panel type makes a direct comparison difficult, but Samsung’s display technology is generally considered superior in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G likely features a more refined image processing pipeline, benefiting from Samsung’s extensive camera expertise. While both phones likely include standard features like night mode and portrait mode, the A52s 5G’s potential for better dynamic range and detail in challenging lighting conditions is higher. The prevalence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras (often 2MP) in this segment suggests focusing on the main sensor’s quality is crucial, and Samsung typically prioritizes this.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G utilizes the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G, fabricated on a 6nm process. This translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 800U (7nm). The Snapdragon 778G’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 performance cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – offers a more balanced and powerful architecture than the Dimensity 800U’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This difference is particularly noticeable in sustained workloads and gaming, where the Snapdragon 778G is less prone to throttling.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G supports 50W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 48 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is limited to 25W charging, taking considerably longer to reach 100%. This makes the F19 Pro+ 5G the clear winner for users who prioritize rapid charging, even if the overall battery endurance is comparable.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G if you prioritize extremely fast charging and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly. Its 50W charging capability significantly reduces downtime. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value sustained performance, a brighter and more visible display, and a more efficient chipset that will likely translate to better long-term battery health and less throttling during demanding tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 800U in the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 800U is capable of running these games, but you may need to lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The 7nm process and less powerful GPU compared to the Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G mean it's more prone to thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions, leading to performance drops.
❓ Is the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G slow compared to the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G's 50W?
Yes, 25W is noticeably slower than 50W. While both phones have similar battery endurance ratings, the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G can fully charge in approximately 48 minutes, whereas the A52s 5G will take significantly longer – likely over 90 minutes. This difference is crucial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 778G's 6nm process benefit the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G in real-world usage?
The 6nm process allows the Snapdragon 778G to operate more efficiently, generating less heat for a given level of performance. This translates to better sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and potentially longer battery life as the phone doesn't need to work as hard to maintain performance.
