Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G vs Motorola Edge 20 Fusion: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing quick top-ups and potentially a lower price point, the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G emerges as the winner. Its 50W charging significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s 30W, reducing downtime. While performance is identical, the charging advantage tips the scales.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G | Motorola Edge 20 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 08 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 166 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 100% in 48 min | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue | Electric Graphite, Cyber Teal |
| Models | CPH2213 | - |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G
- Significantly faster 50W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Identical performance to the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion
- Software experience may be less clean than Motorola's
- Camera details are unknown, potentially a weaker camera system
Motorola Edge 20 Fusion
- Near-stock Android experience (potentially)
- Identical performance to the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G
- Potentially more refined software updates
- Slower 30W charging
- May be priced higher than the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G
- Camera details are unknown
Display Comparison
Both devices likely feature similar LCD or AMOLED panels, given their market positioning. However, specific details like peak brightness (nits), color gamut coverage (DCI-P3), and refresh rate are missing. The absence of high refresh rate information suggests both likely stick to standard 60Hz panels. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of mid-range devices. Without further data, a definitive display winner is impossible to declare.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not detailed enough to draw firm conclusions. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the sensor sizes, lens apertures, and image processing algorithms are unknown. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality; these sensors are often included for marketing purposes rather than practical benefit. Without knowing the main sensor resolution and aperture, it's impossible to assess low-light performance or dynamic range. Image processing style – Oppo’s tendency towards vibrant colors versus Motorola’s more natural approach – would be a key differentiator, but this requires real-world testing.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G and Motorola Edge 20 Fusion utilize the Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7nm). This chipset features an octa-core configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This translates to similar performance in everyday tasks and gaming. The GPU is also identical, meaning graphical performance will be nearly indistinguishable. Thermal management will likely depend on the phone's internal design and cooling solutions, a detail not provided. The use of the 7nm process node ensures reasonable efficiency, but sustained heavy loads could lead to throttling on both devices.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the key differentiator here is charging speed. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G boasts 50W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 48 minutes. The Motorola Edge 20 Fusion, with its 30W charging, will take considerably longer to fully charge. This 20W difference is substantial, especially for users who frequently need to top up their phones throughout the day. Even if the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion has a slightly larger battery capacity, the Oppo’s faster charging will likely result in less perceived downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G if you need consistently fast charging and are frequently on the go, minimizing downtime. Its 50W charging is a significant advantage. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion if you prioritize a potentially cleaner software experience (Motorola's near-stock Android) and are less concerned with rapid charging speeds, or if it's available at a substantially lower price.