The Oppo F19 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The F19 Pro, with its Helio P95, aims for a balance of features at a competitive price. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G, however, prioritizes 5G connectivity and significantly faster charging, powered by the Snapdragon 695. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and convenience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a more efficient architecture, and the 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the F19 Pro remains a capable device, it falls behind in these crucial areas.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 08 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | CPH2285 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo F19 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Established brand reputation
- Older, less efficient chipset
- Slower 30W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Future-proof 5G connectivity
- Potentially higher price
- Software experience can be polarizing (MIUI)
- May have more bloatware
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are absent, the focus here is on the underlying processing power impacting display responsiveness. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Snapdragon 695, built on a 6nm process, offers a more efficient platform for driving the display, potentially leading to smoother animations and slightly better power management compared to the F19 Pro’s 12nm Helio P95.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the main sensors, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G benefits from the more modern ISP (Image Signal Processor) integrated within the Snapdragon 695. This ISP is capable of faster image processing and potentially better noise reduction, especially in low-light conditions. The F19 Pro’s Helio P95 ISP is older and less capable. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s chipset also supports more advanced camera features, such as improved HDR processing and potentially better video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Oppo F19 Pro’s MediaTek Helio P95 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially sustained performance during demanding tasks. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz prime core configuration, the Snapdragon’s Kryo 660 Gold cores are built on a more modern architecture, offering improved IPC (Instructions Per Clock) compared to the Helio P95’s Cortex-A75 cores. This means the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G will likely handle multitasking and graphically intensive applications more smoothly.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W charging is the standout feature. Advertised to reach 100% in 42 minutes, and 50% in 15, it drastically reduces charging times compared to the Oppo F19 Pro’s 30W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the efficiency gains of the Snapdragon 695 (6nm) partially offset any potential capacity difference. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G offers a significantly more convenient charging experience, minimizing downtime and maximizing usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 Pro if you need a reliable smartphone for everyday tasks and aren't concerned with 5G or extremely fast charging. It's a solid option for users on a tighter budget. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prioritize 5G connectivity, rapid charging, and a more modern chipset architecture for improved long-term performance and efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a consistently smooth experience. While not a flagship-level gaming chip, its improved efficiency over the Helio P95 in the F19 Pro will result in less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the Oppo F19 Pro's 30W charging in real-world use?
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G can charge from 0-100% in approximately 42 minutes, while the Oppo F19 Pro will take considerably longer, likely exceeding an hour and a half. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G useful if 5G coverage is limited in my area?
Even with limited 5G coverage, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G will fall back to 4G LTE. The 5G modem provides future-proofing and potentially better 4G performance due to improved modem technology. It also supports a wider range of network bands.
