The Oppo F19 Pro and vivo V21 5G represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in the chipset department. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs, focusing on performance, display quality, camera capabilities, and battery life.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo V21 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Oppo F19 Pro’s Helio P95, translating to smoother multitasking and better gaming. While both offer similar battery endurance, the V21 5G’s faster 33W charging is a significant convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | - | 78 Sub6 - India |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 08 | 2021, April 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, May 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 159.7 x 73.9 x 7.3 mm (6.29 x 2.91 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF, OIS |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps (no OIS), 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF, OIS |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps (no OIS), 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 33W wired, 63% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver | Dusk Blue, Sunset Dazzle, Arctic White |
| Models | CPH2285 | V2050 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 336699 (v8), 365055 (v9)
GeekBench: 6516 (v4.4), 1600 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F19 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Adequate performance for basic tasks
- Similar battery endurance to V21 5G
- Older, less efficient Helio P95 chipset
- Slower 30W charging
- Likely inferior gaming performance
vivo V21 5G
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 800U chipset
- Faster 33W charging (63% in 30 mins)
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- 5G connectivity
- Potentially higher price
- Similar battery endurance to F19 Pro despite efficiency gains
Display Comparison
The vivo V21 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 761 nits, compared to an unspecified value for the Oppo F19 Pro. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays are described as having an infinite contrast ratio (a common marketing term), the V21 5G’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Details regarding panel technology (AMOLED vs IPS) and refresh rate are missing for both, but given the market segment, AMOLED is likely on both, though the V21 5G’s brightness suggests a higher-quality panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, and image processing are absent. Without this information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording. The lack of detail regarding the main sensor resolution makes it hard to assess image quality. We can assume both phones include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but the Dimensity 800U’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the V21 5G likely offers more advanced image processing capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo V21 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7nm) is a significant step up from the Oppo F19 Pro’s Helio P95 (12nm). The 7nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance. The Dimensity 800U’s CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – provides a performance advantage over the F19 Pro’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This difference is particularly noticeable in GPU performance, making the V21 5G the better choice for mobile gaming. The V21 5G also benefits from 5G connectivity, while the F19 Pro’s network capabilities are not specified.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo F19 Pro and vivo V21 5G achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life. However, the V21 5G’s 33W wired charging significantly outperforms the F19 Pro’s 30W charging, achieving 63% charge in just 30 minutes. This faster charging speed is a practical advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery. While both phones likely have similar battery capacities (estimated around 4300-4500 mAh based on market trends), the Dimensity 800U’s superior power efficiency may contribute to slightly longer real-world usage on the V21 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 Pro if you prioritize a slightly lower initial cost and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, calls, and light web browsing. The Helio P95 is adequate for these scenarios. Buy the vivo V21 5G if you value smoother performance, especially for gaming or demanding applications, and appreciate the convenience of faster charging. The Dimensity 800U offers a more future-proof experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 800U in the vivo V21 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Dimensity 800U is significantly more capable of handling demanding games like PUBG Mobile than the Helio P95. Its more powerful GPU and efficient architecture allow for higher frame rates and smoother gameplay, even on higher graphics settings. While not a flagship-level gaming experience, it provides a very enjoyable experience for mobile gamers.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the vivo V21 5G compared to the Oppo F19 Pro's 30W charging in real-world use?
The vivo V21 5G’s 33W charging can reach 63% charge in 30 minutes, while the Oppo F19 Pro’s 30W charging will take considerably longer. This translates to a significant time saving, especially for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery. Expect a full charge on the V21 5G to be approximately 15-20 minutes faster than on the F19 Pro.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Helio P95 and Dimensity 800U noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
While both chipsets can handle everyday tasks, the Dimensity 800U in the vivo V21 5G provides a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience. App loading times are faster, multitasking is more fluid, and scrolling through social media feeds feels less laggy. The difference is subtle for basic use, but becomes apparent with heavier multitasking.
