The Oppo F19 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this goal, primarily through their chipset choices. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best value and performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, delivers significantly better performance and future-proofing than the Oppo F19 Pro’s Helio P95. While the Oppo offers faster 30W charging, the A52s’ overall package is more compelling.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 08 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | CPH2285 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 250 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F19 Pro
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Sleek design (subjective)
- Less powerful Helio P95 chipset
- Less efficient 12nm fabrication process
- Potentially inferior camera image processing
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- More efficient 6nm fabrication process
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- 5G connectivity
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo F19 Pro. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED panels), the A52s’ higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Details regarding the F19 Pro’s panel technology (e.g., PWM dimming rate) are missing, making it difficult to assess its suitability for users sensitive to flicker.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor size information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Snapdragon 778G’s image signal processor (ISP) is generally more advanced than the Helio P95’s, potentially resulting in better image processing, dynamic range, and low-light performance on the A52s. The prevalence of marketing-focused 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests neither should be considered a serious photography tool; focusing on the main sensor performance is key.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo F19 Pro’s MediaTek Helio P95 (12nm). The Snapdragon 778G features a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – versus the F19 Pro’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 6nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon also provides superior power efficiency, leading to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This means the A52s will maintain higher performance for longer periods, particularly in gaming.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite the Oppo F19 Pro’s 30W charging versus the A52s’ 25W charging. The Snapdragon 778G’s superior efficiency likely offsets the slightly slower charging speed, allowing the A52s to maintain its endurance despite potentially drawing more power during intensive tasks. While the F19 Pro charges faster, the A52s’ efficiency means you may not need to charge it as frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 Pro if you prioritize fast charging and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media and light web browsing. Its 30W charging will get you back up and running quickly. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value performance, 5G connectivity, and a more refined user experience, especially if you enjoy mobile gaming or demanding applications. The Snapdragon 778G provides a noticeable advantage in these areas.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G handle demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G is a capable chipset for gaming. It can comfortably run PUBG at high settings and Genshin Impact at medium settings with stable frame rates. The 6nm process also helps to minimize thermal throttling, ensuring consistent performance during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Oppo F19 Pro significantly faster in real-world use compared to the A52s 5G’s 25W charging?
While 30W is faster on paper, the difference in charging times isn't massive. The Oppo F19 Pro will likely charge slightly quicker, but the A52s 5G’s more efficient chipset means you may not need to charge it as often, mitigating the slower charging speed.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G supports carrier aggregation, allowing the A52s 5G to combine multiple 5G bands for significantly faster download and upload speeds where available from your carrier. This is a key advantage for users in areas with robust 5G infrastructure.
