The Oppo F19 Pro and Motorola Edge 20 Fusion represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim for a balance of features and affordability, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving it. The F19 Pro leans on a sleek design and established brand recognition, while the Edge 20 Fusion prioritizes processing power with a more modern chipset. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 800U chipset, built on a 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Oppo F19 Pro’s Helio P95, translating to smoother multitasking and better gaming. While both offer 30W charging, the Fusion’s superior efficiency makes it the better all-around choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 08 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 166 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver | Electric Graphite, Cyber Teal |
| Models | CPH2285 | - |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo F19 Pro
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Established brand reputation
- Competitive 30W charging
- Older, less efficient Helio P95 chipset
- Potential for thermal throttling under load
- Likely inferior gaming performance
Motorola Edge 20 Fusion
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 800U chipset
- Smoother multitasking and gaming experience
- Better long-term performance potential
- May not have the same design focus as the F19 Pro
- Motorola’s software update track record is less consistent
- Potentially less brand recognition in some markets
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize AMOLED panels, a common feature in this price bracket, but specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are absent. The key difference lies under the hood: processing power impacts UI smoothness. A faster chipset like the Dimensity 800U in the Edge 20 Fusion will contribute to a more responsive experience when scrolling and navigating, even if the raw panel specs are similar. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within their respective form factors.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Edge 20 Fusion likely features a more capable main sensor. Motorola often prioritizes image processing algorithms to enhance detail and dynamic range. The Helio P95’s ISP in the F19 Pro is older, potentially limiting its ability to process complex scenes effectively. While both phones likely include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, the Fusion’s superior processing power will likely result in better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. We can assume both will include a suite of secondary cameras, but their quality is unlikely to be a deciding factor.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s Mediatek Dimensity 800U represents a significant leap over the Oppo F19 Pro’s Helio P95. The 7nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 800U is far more efficient than the 12nm process of the Helio P95, resulting in lower power consumption and reduced thermal throttling. The CPU architecture also favors the Fusion: Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.4 GHz) in the Dimensity 800U outperform the Cortex-A75 cores (2x2.2 GHz) in the Helio P95. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The Fusion is the clear winner for users who prioritize performance.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 30W wired charging, suggesting comparable charging speeds – roughly 60-70 minutes for a full charge. However, the Dimensity 800U’s 7nm efficiency gives the Edge 20 Fusion a significant advantage in battery life. The Helio P95 in the F19 Pro will consume more power for the same tasks, leading to shorter runtimes. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Fusion’s chipset efficiency will likely offset any potential capacity differences, providing a more reliable all-day battery experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F19 Pro if you prioritize a slim, lightweight design and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media and light web browsing. Its aesthetic appeal and established brand may be appealing. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion if you value performance, especially for gaming or demanding applications, and want a phone that will feel more future-proof thanks to its more efficient and powerful chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Dimensity 800U chipset in the Edge 20 Fusion is well-equipped to handle PUBG Mobile at high settings. The 7nm process and Cortex-A76 cores provide the necessary processing power and thermal headroom for a consistently smooth gaming experience, unlike the Helio P95 which may struggle with sustained performance.
❓ Does the Oppo F19 Pro’s Helio P95 chipset suffer from noticeable throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio P95, built on a 12nm process, is prone to thermal throttling under sustained load. While it can handle casual gaming, extended gaming sessions or demanding applications will likely result in reduced performance as the chipset heats up. The Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U is far less susceptible to this issue.
❓ How does the 30W charging compare in real-world usage between the two phones?
While both phones support 30W charging, the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion will likely benefit from faster overall charging times due to the Dimensity 800U’s more efficient power management. The F19 Pro’s Helio P95 consumes more power, potentially slowing down the charging process and generating more heat.
