The mid-range 5G smartphone market is heating up, and the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G and vivo V21 5G are two strong contenders. Both offer 5G connectivity, stylish designs, and competitive features, but which one truly comes out on top? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G edges out the vivo V21 5G thanks to its significantly faster charging and potentially better overall performance. However, the vivo V21 5G boasts a brighter display and a strong endurance rating, making it a compelling alternative for users prioritizing battery life and screen visibility.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 78 Sub6 - India |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 08 | 2021, April 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, May 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 159.7 x 73.9 x 7.3 mm (6.29 x 2.91 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6853 Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF, OIS |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps (no OIS), 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF, OIS |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps (no OIS), 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 100% in 48 min (advertised) | 33W wired, 63% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh, non-removable | 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue | Dusk Blue, Sunset Dazzle, Arctic White |
| Models | CPH2213 | V2050 |
| Price | ₹ 25,990 | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 336699 (v8), 365055 (v9)
GeekBench: 6516 (v4.4), 1600 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G
- 50W Fast Charging
- Potentially better main camera
- Sleek Design
- 5G Connectivity
- Battery life not as impressive as V21 5G
- Display brightness slightly lower
vivo V21 5G
- Excellent Battery Life (123h endurance)
- Bright Display (761 nits)
- Strong Selfie Camera
- 5G Connectivity
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Potentially less powerful main camera
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, but the vivo V21 5G shines with a measured peak brightness of 761 nits, offering better visibility in bright sunlight. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G's display is still good, but doesn't reach the same level of brightness. The vivo V21 5G advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, which is a nominal value, but suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera setups. The vivo V21 5G is often praised for its selfie camera capabilities, featuring a high-resolution front-facing sensor. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G likely has a more capable main camera sensor, potentially resulting in better low-light performance and overall image quality. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable.
Performance
Both devices utilize the Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset, so raw processing power should be similar. However, Oppo's software optimization and potentially slightly better thermal management could give it a marginal edge in sustained performance. Real-world usage will likely feel very comparable.
Battery Life
The vivo V21 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 123 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G, while not as long-lasting, compensates with its 50W fast charging, promising a 100% charge in approximately 48 minutes. This offers a trade-off between longevity and charging speed.
Buying Guide
The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, and potentially a slightly more powerful processor for demanding tasks. The vivo V21 5G is a great choice for those who value long battery life, a vibrant display, and a sleek design, especially if camera performance is a key consideration.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The vivo V21 5G has a significantly better endurance rating (123h) compared to the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G, indicating longer battery life.
❓ Is the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G worth the extra cost?
If fast charging and potentially slightly better overall performance are important to you, then the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G is worth the extra cost. Otherwise, the vivo V21 5G offers excellent value with its long battery life and bright display.
