Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G and Samsung Galaxy M51 are both compelling mid-range options, but cater to different priorities. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G offers significantly faster charging and 5G connectivity, alongside a more modern chipset. However, the Galaxy M51 boasts exceptional battery life and a brighter display. For speed and future-proofing, Oppo wins; for endurance, Samsung takes the crown.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 08 | 2020, August 31. Released 2020, September 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3+), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED Plus |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6853 Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 100% in 48 min (advertised) | 25W wired, 100% in 115 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 7000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue | Celestial Black, Electric Blue, White |
| Models | CPH2213 | SM-M515F, SM-M515F/DSN |
| Price | ₹ 25,990 | About 470 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.38 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.61 W/kg (head) 1.45 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 156h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 266620 (v8)
GeekBench: 1774 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G
- Faster Charging (50W)
- 5G Connectivity
- More Modern Chipset (Dimensity 800U)
- Potentially Better Camera Processing
- Lower Battery Capacity
- Less Bright Display
- May lack reverse charging
Samsung Galaxy M51
- Exceptional Battery Life (156h Endurance)
- Brighter Display (677 nits)
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Good Value
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Older Chipset (Snapdragon 730G)
- Potentially Less Smooth Performance
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy M51's display shines with a measured peak brightness of 677 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G's display is good, it doesn't reach the same brightness levels. The M51's 'infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term) suggests deep blacks, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience. Both phones likely feature AMOLED panels, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G likely has a slight edge in image processing and low-light performance due to its newer chipset. The Galaxy M51's camera is still very good, producing detailed and vibrant photos. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison, but both offer versatile shooting options.
Performance
The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G's Dimensity 800U chipset provides a noticeable performance edge over the Galaxy M51's Snapdragon 730G. The Dimensity 800U's 7nm process also contributes to better power efficiency. While the M51 is still capable for everyday tasks, the Oppo will handle demanding games and multitasking more smoothly. 5G connectivity is another significant advantage for the Oppo.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy M51 truly excels in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 156 hours. This is a significant advantage over the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G. While the Oppo's 50W charging is incredibly fast (advertised 48-minute charge), the M51's sheer battery capacity provides longer usage between charges. The M51 also features reverse wired charging, a useful addition.
Buying Guide
The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, 5G speeds, and a more recent processor. The Samsung Galaxy M51 is perfect for those who need exceptional battery life and a bright, vivid display, even if it means sacrificing some performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G is generally better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset and 5G connectivity.
❓ How long does the Samsung Galaxy M51's battery last?
The Samsung Galaxy M51 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 156 hours, meaning it can easily last a day or two on a single charge with moderate usage.
