The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A54. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its superior display, longer software support, and excellent battery life. While the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G boasts faster charging, the A54's consistent performance and broader appeal make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 08 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6853 Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 100% in 48 min (advertised) | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | CPH2213 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | ₹ 25,990 | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G
- 50W Fast Charging
- Sleek Design
- 5G Connectivity
- Less Consistent Performance
- Shorter Battery Life
- Oversaturated Camera Colors
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent Display (Super AMOLED)
- Long Battery Life
- Guaranteed Software Updates
- Better Camera Performance
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Design is less distinctive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its 980 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio provide a stunning visual experience, especially outdoors. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G's display is decent, but lacks the A54's vibrancy and brightness. The A54's Super AMOLED panel is a significant advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Galaxy A54 generally produces more natural-looking photos with better dynamic range. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G's camera tends to oversaturate colors. Video recording is also slightly better on the A54 due to improved stabilization.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 offers a more refined and consistent performance compared to the Dimensity 800U in the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G. While the Oppo's chipset is capable, the A54's 5nm process provides better efficiency and sustained performance under load. Gaming and multitasking feel smoother on the A54.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54 dominates in battery life. Its endurance rating of 119h is exceptional, and active use lasting 11:15h is impressive. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G's 50W charging is faster, but it starts from a significantly lower battery capacity, resulting in shorter overall battery life.
Buying Guide
The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a sleek design. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a better fit for those seeking a vibrant display, long-lasting battery, and guaranteed software updates for years to come.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A54 offers significantly longer software support with guaranteed updates for several years, a key advantage over the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G.
❓ Is the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G worth it if fast charging is a priority?
If fast charging is your absolute top priority, the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G's 50W charging is faster than the A54's 25W. However, consider the trade-offs in battery life and overall performance.
