The Oppo F17 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The F17 prioritizes a streamlined experience and efficient power management, while the Redmi Note 10 Pro aims for flagship-level performance with its Dimensity 1100 chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset delivers significantly more processing power, and the 67W charging drastically reduces downtime. However, the Oppo F17 remains a viable option for those seeking a more balanced, energy-efficient device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 02. Released 2020, September 24 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 72.8 x 7.5 mm (6.29 x 2.87 x 0.30 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 53 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Orange, Navy Blue, Classic Silver | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | CPH2095 | - |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F17
- Efficient Snapdragon 662 chipset for good battery life.
- 30W fast charging provides a reasonable recharge time.
- Likely a more streamlined and user-friendly software experience.
- Significantly less powerful than the Redmi Note 10 Pro.
- May struggle with demanding games and applications.
- Slower charging compared to the competition.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 1100 chipset for excellent performance.
- Ultra-fast 67W charging for minimal downtime.
- Likely a more advanced camera system with better image quality.
- Potentially higher power consumption due to the more powerful chipset.
- May run warmer under heavy load.
- Software experience may be more feature-rich but potentially less refined.
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, the Redmi Note 10 Pro, given its higher overall positioning, likely features a higher resolution and potentially a higher refresh rate panel than the Oppo F17. The Dimensity 1100's ISP supports higher resolution camera sensors, suggesting a display capable of showcasing detailed images. The F17 likely focuses on color accuracy and viewing angles for everyday use, while the Redmi Note 10 Pro aims for a more immersive visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, we can infer differences based on chipset capabilities. The Dimensity 1100’s image signal processor (ISP) is designed to handle larger, higher-resolution sensors and more complex image processing algorithms. This suggests the Redmi Note 10 Pro likely features a more capable camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and improved low-light performance. The Oppo F17’s camera will likely focus on providing good results in well-lit conditions, but may lack the dynamic range and detail capture of the Redmi Note 10 Pro.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) boasts a significant advantage over the Oppo F17’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The Dimensity 1100’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.6 GHz, offer substantially higher single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and smooth multitasking. The 6nm process node also translates to improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 662, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with graphically intensive games and demanding applications compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro. The Redmi Note 10 Pro's likely use of faster LPDDR5 RAM further enhances its performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 67W charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 42 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Oppo F17’s 30W charging, which takes 53 minutes to reach 100%. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging speed of the Redmi Note 10 Pro effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Oppo F17’s 30W charging is still respectable, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro offers a far more convenient charging experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F17 if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and don't demand the absolute highest performance for gaming or demanding tasks. It's ideal for users who value efficiency and a smooth, consistent experience. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prioritize gaming, multitasking, and fast charging above all else. This phone is for power users who want a near-flagship experience without the flagship price tag.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 1100 is a powerful chip, the 6nm process node and Xiaomi's thermal management solutions should prevent significant overheating. However, some throttling is possible during extended, graphically intensive gaming. Expect slightly reduced frame rates after prolonged use, but overall a smoother experience than the Snapdragon 662.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Oppo F17 slow compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro's 67W?
Yes, 30W is considerably slower than 67W. The Redmi Note 10 Pro can fully charge in 42 minutes, while the Oppo F17 takes 53 minutes. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ How will the Snapdragon 662 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 662 can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The Redmi Note 10 Pro's Dimensity 1100 will provide a much more fluid gaming experience at higher settings.
