The sub-€300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Oppo F17, with its focus on design and efficient power management, clashes with the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, a performance-oriented device boasting a more powerful chipset and larger battery. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 732G chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Oppo F17’s Snapdragon 662, making it better suited for gaming and demanding applications. While the Oppo F17 offers faster charging, the Poco X3 NFC’s endurance rating and overall value are compelling.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 02. Released 2020, September 24 | 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 72.8 x 7.5 mm (6.29 x 2.87 x 0.30 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1
|
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 53 min | 33W wired, 62% in 30 min, 100% in 65 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Orange, Navy Blue, Classic Silver | Cobalt Blue, Shadow Gray |
| Models | CPH2095 | M2007J20CG, M2007J20CT |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | € 259.00 |
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | Rp 2,800,000 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | € 229.00 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 119.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 125h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1299:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 283750 (v8)
GeekBench: 1777 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F17
- Faster 30W charging
- Potentially slimmer and more stylish design (based on Oppo's brand image)
- Efficient Snapdragon 662 chipset for basic tasks
- Less powerful Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Missing display specifications
- Unknown battery capacity
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
- More powerful Snapdragon 732G chipset
- Excellent 125-hour endurance rating
- Available with up to 8GB of RAM
- Slightly slower charging speed
- Potentially bulkier design
- Basic camera specifications (details missing)
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1299:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like resolution, panel type (IPS vs AMOLED), and refresh rate are missing for the Oppo F17. The Poco X3 NFC’s larger 6.67-inch display is likely to offer a more immersive viewing experience. Without knowing the Oppo F17’s peak brightness, it’s difficult to assess its outdoor visibility compared to the Poco X3 NFC.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are absent. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison impossible. However, given the Poco X3 NFC’s focus on value, it’s reasonable to assume it offers a more capable main camera sensor. The Oppo F17 likely prioritizes software enhancements and aesthetic filters over raw image quality. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on many phones in this price range is often a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC’s Snapdragon 732G (8nm) significantly outperforms the Oppo F17’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 732G features Kryo 470 Gold cores clocked at 2.3 GHz, compared to the 662’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores. This translates to a roughly 20-30% performance increase in CPU-intensive tasks and a more substantial gain in GPU performance. The 8nm process node of the 732G also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Poco X3 NFC’s availability with 6GB or 8GB of RAM further enhances its multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The Poco X3 NFC boasts an endurance rating of 125 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Oppo F17’s battery capacity is unknown, its 30W charging is faster than the Poco X3 NFC’s 33W, achieving 50% charge in 30 minutes versus 62% for the Poco. However, the Poco X3 NFC still reaches 100% in 65 minutes, only 12 minutes slower than the Oppo F17’s 53 minutes. The Poco X3 NFC’s larger battery and efficient chipset likely offset the slightly slower charging speed, providing all-day battery life for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F17 if you prioritize a slimmer profile, a more refined aesthetic, and slightly faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse social media, make calls, and take casual photos. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC if you value performance, longer battery life, and a more aggressive price point. This phone is perfect for gamers, power users, and those who demand more from their smartphone without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 732G in the Poco X3 NFC handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 732G is specifically designed for gaming. It can comfortably run PUBG Mobile at high settings with stable frame rates. The 8nm process and improved CPU/GPU architecture minimize throttling, ensuring consistent performance during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Oppo F17 significantly faster in real-world use compared to the Poco X3 NFC’s 33W?
While the Oppo F17 charges slightly faster initially (50% in 30 minutes vs 62% for the Poco), the difference in 0-100% charge time is only 12 minutes. The Poco X3 NFC’s larger battery capacity means you’ll still get a full day of use, even with the slightly slower charging speed.
❓ What kind of storage and RAM options are available for the Poco X3 NFC?
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is available in three configurations: 64GB storage with 6GB RAM (€229), 128GB storage with 6GB RAM (€259), and 128GB storage with 8GB RAM (Rp 2,800,000). Choosing the 128GB/6GB or 128GB/8GB variant is recommended for smoother multitasking and ample storage for apps and media.
