The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F17 and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW represent compelling options for users seeking 5G connectivity without a flagship price tag. This comparison dives deep into their core specifications, focusing on the performance implications of their respective Snapdragon chipsets and the trade-offs between charging speed and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, delivers a noticeable performance uplift over the Oppo F17’s Snapdragon 662, justifying the slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 260, 261 SA/NSA/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 02. Released 2020, September 24 | 2020, July 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, July 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 72.8 x 7.5 mm (6.29 x 2.87 x 0.30 in) | 162.8 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, One UI 2.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 53 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Orange, Navy Blue, Classic Silver | Prism Bricks Black |
| Models | CPH2095 | SM-A716V |
| Price | About 200 EUR | - |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | 0.50 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) |
Oppo F17
- Faster 30W charging
- Potentially lighter and more compact design
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Potentially lower performance in demanding tasks
- May receive fewer software updates
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Improved 5G performance
- Better thermal management
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially higher price
- May be larger and heavier
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like OLED vs LCD) are missing, the focus here is on performance. The chipset's ability to drive the display smoothly is more critical than raw resolution. The A71 5G UW's more powerful GPU will likely translate to better performance in graphically intensive applications, even if the displays are similar in resolution and refresh rate.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the chipset plays a crucial role in image processing. The Snapdragon 765G’s image signal processor (ISP) is more advanced than the 662’s, enabling better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the A71 5G UW will likely deliver more consistently impressive results due to its superior processing power.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) is a significant step up from the Oppo F17’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 7nm process allows for greater transistor density and improved thermal efficiency, meaning the A71 5G UW can sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling. The CPU configuration also favors the Samsung device, with a 2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime core alongside a 2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold core, compared to the F17’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores. This translates to faster app loading times and a more responsive user interface on the A71 5G UW.
Battery Life
The Oppo F17’s 30W wired charging is a clear advantage, achieving 50% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 53 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW’s 25W charging is slower. However, the Snapdragon 765G’s improved power efficiency may offset some of this difference in real-world usage. The A71 5G UW’s larger battery (spec not provided, but typical for the A71 series) will likely provide longer overall battery life, despite the slower charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F17 if you prioritize rapid charging and a lighter, more streamlined user experience, and your primary use case doesn't involve demanding games or heavy multitasking. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW if you value 5G performance, smoother multitasking, and a more capable chipset for gaming and future software updates, even if it means slightly slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 765G in the A71 5G UW handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at high settings with playable frame rates. Its Adreno 620 GPU provides a significant performance boost over the Adreno 618 in the Snapdragon 662, allowing for smoother gameplay and higher graphical fidelity. However, sustained performance may be limited by thermal throttling, so extended gaming sessions might require adjusting settings.
❓ How much of a real-world difference will the charging speed difference make between the Oppo F17 and the Samsung A71 5G UW?
The Oppo F17’s 30W charging is noticeably faster. While the A71 5G UW isn’t slow, the F17 can gain a significant charge in a short amount of time – 50% in just 30 minutes. This is ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. However, the A71 5G UW’s potentially larger battery capacity might offset some of this difference in overall daily usage.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G modem in the A71 5G UW supports carrier aggregation, which combines multiple 5G channels to deliver faster and more reliable 5G speeds. This is particularly important in areas with limited 5G coverage or network congestion. The Oppo F17's 5G capabilities are likely more limited due to the older Snapdragon 662 modem.
