The Oppo F17 and OnePlus Nord N10 5G represent distinct approaches to the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. The F17 prioritizes a sleek design and fast charging, while the Nord N10 5G aims for a more robust 5G experience with a newer chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord N10 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 690 chipset, built on an 8nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the F17’s Snapdragon 662, and the similar battery endurance and charging speeds make it a well-rounded package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 28, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1024/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 02. Released 2020, September 24 | 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, November 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 72.8 x 7.5 mm (6.29 x 2.87 x 0.30 in) | 163 x 74.7 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.49 inches, 101.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619L |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.1 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 53 min | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Orange, Navy Blue, Classic Silver | Midnight Ice |
| Models | CPH2095 | BE2029, BE2025, BE2026, BE2028 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 99h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 279579 (v8)
GeekBench: 1848 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F17
- Faster charging to 100% (53 mins vs potentially longer on N10)
- Potentially slimmer design (based on brand reputation)
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Likely lower display brightness and contrast
- Limited detailed camera specifications
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 690 5G chipset
- Brighter display with higher contrast ratio
- Improved 5G performance and connectivity
- Potentially bulkier design
- Charging time to 100% not specified
- Similar battery endurance to F17 despite more efficient chipset
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord N10 5G boasts a brighter display, measured at 440 nits, compared to the Oppo F17 (brightness unspecified). This difference is significant for outdoor visibility. While both likely utilize LCD panels, the Nord N10 5G’s 1447:1 contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and a more vibrant image. The Oppo F17’s display specifications are less detailed, making a direct comparison challenging, but the Nord N10 5G clearly has the edge in display quality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specs are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 690’s image signal processor (ISP) in the Nord N10 5G is more advanced than the 662’s, potentially leading to better image processing, especially in low-light conditions. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography. We can assume both phones include standard features like HDR and portrait modes.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord N10 5G’s Snapdragon 690 5G (8nm) is a clear upgrade over the Oppo F17’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 8nm process allows for greater transistor density and improved thermal efficiency, translating to sustained performance under load. The CPU configuration – 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver on the Nord N10 5G versus 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver on the F17 – further favors the Nord N10 5G, particularly in multi-threaded tasks. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the chipset difference will be the primary determinant of real-world performance.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo F17 and OnePlus Nord N10 5G share a 30W wired charging capability, with the F17 achieving 50% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 53 minutes. Both phones also have an endurance rating of 99h. This suggests similar battery life despite potentially different battery capacities. The faster charging on the F17 could be a benefit for users who frequently need a quick top-up, but the Nord N10 5G’s more efficient chipset might offset any capacity differences in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F17 if you prioritize a slimmer profile and exceptionally fast 30W charging, and your usage primarily revolves around everyday tasks like social media and light browsing. Buy the OnePlus Nord N10 5G if you value 5G performance, smoother multitasking, and a brighter display, especially if you occasionally engage in mobile gaming or streaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 690 in the Nord N10 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 690 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship-level gaming experience, it provides a noticeable improvement over the Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo F17, offering smoother gameplay and reduced lag.
❓ How does the 5G performance differ between the Oppo F17 and the OnePlus Nord N10 5G?
The OnePlus Nord N10 5G, equipped with the Snapdragon 690 5G, is specifically designed for 5G connectivity. The Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo F17 supports 5G, but the 690 offers improved modem capabilities, resulting in faster download and upload speeds, and more reliable 5G connections.
❓ Is the camera on the Nord N10 5G significantly better for low-light photography?
While detailed camera specs are limited, the Snapdragon 690’s more advanced ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Nord N10 5G is expected to perform better in low-light conditions. It can process images more effectively, reducing noise and preserving detail compared to the Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo F17.
