The Oppo F17 and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this goal, particularly in chipset choice and overall feature set. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 765 5G chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Oppo F17’s Snapdragon 662, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications. While charging is slower, the comparable battery endurance mitigates this.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 02. Released 2020, September 24 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 72.8 x 7.5 mm (6.29 x 2.87 x 0.30 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 53 min | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Orange, Navy Blue, Classic Silver | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | CPH2095 | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 114h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.4 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 299926 (v8)
GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F17
- Faster 30W charging
- Potentially sleeker design (based on brand aesthetic)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially inferior camera performance
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- More powerful Snapdragon 765 5G chipset
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Slower 20W charging
- Potentially higher price point
- Larger size/weight (likely)
Display Comparison
Both phones share a contrast ratio of 1269:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 543 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo F17. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (given the price point), the Moto G 5G Plus’s superior brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Oppo F17. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus likely features a more capable primary sensor, given its positioning as a slightly higher-tier device. While both will likely struggle in low-light conditions, the Snapdragon 765’s image signal processor (ISP) offers more advanced processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction in the Motorola. It's important to note that focusing on megapixel counts alone is misleading; sensor size and image processing are far more critical.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is powered by the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a prime Kryo 475 core clocked at 2.3 GHz. This is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo F17’s Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11nm) and its 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 765 is more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. The architectural differences – a dedicated prime core in the 765 – also contribute to snappier responsiveness in demanding tasks. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Motorola.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite the Oppo F17’s faster 30W charging. The Oppo F17 can reach 50% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 53 minutes, while the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus charges at a slower 20W. However, the comparable endurance ratings indicate that the more efficient Snapdragon 765 in the Motorola offsets the slower charging speed, providing similar all-day usability. The faster charging of the Oppo F17 is beneficial for quick top-ups, but doesn't necessarily translate to a longer-lasting charge overall.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F17 if you prioritize fast charging and a sleek design, and your primary use case revolves around basic smartphone functions like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you value performance for gaming, streaming, and multitasking, and want a phone that will feel more future-proof thanks to its more powerful processor and 5G capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While not a flagship gaming phone, the Snapdragon 765 5G in the Moto G 5G Plus is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with acceptable frame rates. The Adreno 620 GPU provides sufficient graphical power for a smooth gaming experience, though you may need to lower settings for sustained performance during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How does the 5G performance differ between the Oppo F17 and the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus?
Both phones support 5G, but the Snapdragon 765 in the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a more advanced 5G modem, offering potentially faster and more reliable 5G connectivity. The Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo F17 supports 5G, but its modem is less sophisticated, potentially resulting in lower peak speeds and less stable connections in areas with weaker 5G coverage.
❓ Is the camera on the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus good enough for casual photography and social media?
Yes, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus’s camera is well-suited for casual photography and social media sharing. While it won’t compete with flagship phone cameras, the Snapdragon 765’s ISP and likely larger sensor size (compared to the Oppo F17, based on market positioning) will deliver good image quality in well-lit conditions. Expect decent dynamic range and color accuracy for everyday snapshots.
