The Oppo F17 and Honor 9X Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The F17 prioritizes rapid charging and a sleek design, while the 9X Pro focuses on chipset efficiency and a respectable battery endurance rating. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing quick top-ups and a modern aesthetic, the Oppo F17 is the better choice thanks to its 30W charging. However, users who value sustained performance and longer battery life between charges will find the Honor 9X Pro more appealing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 02. Released 2020, September 24 | 2019, July 23. Released 2019, August 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 72.8 x 7.5 mm (6.29 x 2.87 x 0.30 in) | 163.5 x 77.3 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 106.6 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x1.88 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Kirin 810 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 MP6 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, EMUI 9.1, no Google Play Services |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE (International)5.0, A2DP, LE (China) |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 53 min | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Orange, Navy Blue, Classic Silver | Midnight Black, Phantom Purple |
| Models | CPH2095 | HLK-AL10, HLK-TL10, HLK-L41, HLK-L42 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1319:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-31.1 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 312668 (v8)
GeekBench: 7836 (v4.4), 1911 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F17
- 30W Fast Charging: Significantly reduces charging time.
- Modern Design: Likely features a more contemporary aesthetic.
- Sufficient Performance: Snapdragon 662 handles everyday tasks well.
- Less Powerful Chipset: Snapdragon 662 lags behind the Kirin 810.
- Unknown Battery Capacity: Limits assessment of overall battery life.
Honor 9X Pro
- Efficient Kirin 810: Offers better performance and power efficiency.
- Long Battery Life: 104-hour endurance rating is highly competitive.
- Good Display Brightness: 517 nits provides adequate visibility.
- Slow Charging: 10W charging is significantly slower than the Oppo F17.
- Limited Camera Details: Lack of specs makes camera performance uncertain.
Display Comparison
The Honor 9X Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 517 nits and a 1319:1 contrast ratio, providing a visually pleasing experience. While the Oppo F17’s display specifications are not provided, the Honor 9X Pro’s contrast ratio suggests a solid IPS panel. The 517 nits brightness is adequate for indoor use, but may struggle in direct sunlight. Without comparable data for the F17, the 9X Pro holds an advantage in display clarity and visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the market positioning, it’s likely both phones rely on similar sensor technology. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout performer in the camera department, focusing instead on other features. We can assume both will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios.
Performance
The Honor 9X Pro’s Kirin 810 (7nm) chipset offers a significant architectural advantage over the Oppo F17’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 7nm process allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency. The Kirin 810’s CPU configuration – 2x2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x1.88 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a performance edge over the Snapdragon 662’s Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver), particularly in multi-threaded tasks. This translates to smoother multitasking and potentially better gaming performance on the Honor 9X Pro. The Snapdragon 662 is still capable, but the Kirin 810 is demonstrably more powerful.
Battery Life
The Honor 9X Pro achieves an impressive endurance rating of 104 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Oppo F17’s battery capacity is unknown, its 30W wired charging capability is a key differentiator. The F17 can reach 50% charge in just 30 minutes and 100% in 53 minutes. This rapid charging is a significant convenience factor. The 9X Pro’s 10W charging is considerably slower. The 9X Pro prioritizes longevity, while the F17 prioritizes quick replenishment. The 104-hour endurance rating of the 9X Pro suggests a larger battery capacity, offsetting the slower charging speed for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F17 if you need consistently fast charging and frequently find yourself needing a quick power boost throughout the day. Its Snapdragon 662 is sufficient for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the Honor 9X Pro if you prefer a more efficient processor for sustained workloads, value longer battery life, and don't mind slower charging speeds. It's ideal for users who prioritize efficiency over immediate gratification.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Kirin 810 in the Honor 9X Pro experience significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While the Kirin 810 is a capable chipset, its thermal performance can vary depending on the game and device cooling. However, the 7nm process node generally leads to better thermal efficiency compared to the 11nm Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo F17, suggesting the 9X Pro is less likely to experience severe throttling during prolonged gaming.
❓ How much of a difference will the 30W charging on the Oppo F17 make in daily use compared to the 10W charging on the Honor 9X Pro?
The difference is substantial. The Oppo F17 can gain 50% charge in 30 minutes, effectively providing hours of use from a short charging session. The Honor 9X Pro’s 10W charging will take significantly longer – likely over two hours to reach a similar charge level. This makes the F17 ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Given the lack of detailed camera specs, should I assume the camera quality is similar between the Oppo F17 and Honor 9X Pro?
Not necessarily. While both phones are listed with basic 'Photo/Video' capabilities, camera performance is heavily influenced by sensor size, aperture, and image processing algorithms. Without this information, it's reasonable to assume both cameras are mid-range performers, but the Honor 9X Pro's chipset may offer slightly better image processing capabilities.
