Oppo F15 vs Oppo Reno3: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno3 emerges as the clear winner, boasting a more powerful chipset, faster charging, and generally improved performance. While the F15 offers good value, the Reno3's upgrades in processing power and charging speed justify its slightly higher price point for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo F15 | Oppo Reno3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 - APAC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, January 16. Released 2020, January | 2020, March 17. Released 2020, March 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771V Helio P70 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 10, ColorOS 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 44 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, 50% in 30 min | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 73 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | Li-Po 4025 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lightening Black, Unicorn White | Midnight Black, Aurora Blue, Sky White |
| Models | CPH2001 | CPH2043 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | 1.20 W/kg (head) 0.55 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F15
- Sleek design
- Good value for money
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- AMOLED display
- Older chipset
- Slower charging
- Less powerful than Reno3
- Camera slightly less impressive
Oppo Reno3
- Faster chipset (Helio P90)
- Faster 30W charging
- Improved camera performance
- Premium feel
- Better gaming performance
- Slightly more expensive
- Design may be less distinctive than F15
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Reno3 typically has a slightly higher resolution and potentially a marginally better color accuracy, though both are excellent. Screen sizes are similar, around 6.4-6.5 inches, making them comfortable to hold and use.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Reno3 generally has a more versatile setup. It often includes a higher resolution main sensor and potentially improved image processing algorithms, resulting in better low-light performance and more detailed photos. Both typically feature a wide-angle lens and macro lens.
Performance
The Reno3's Helio P90 chipset is a noticeable upgrade over the F15's Helio P70. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better performance in demanding games. The Reno3's CPU architecture (Cortex-A75 cores) provides a significant boost in single-core performance.
Battery Life
The Reno3's 30W charging is a significant advantage over the F15's 20W. The faster charging speeds allow for quicker top-ups, reducing downtime. Battery capacities are similar, around 4000mAh, so real-world battery life should be comparable, but the Reno3's faster charging gives it an edge.
Buying Guide
The Oppo F15 is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize a sleek design and decent performance for everyday tasks. The Oppo Reno3 is ideal for users who demand faster performance, quicker charging, and a slightly more premium experience, especially for photography and gaming.