Oppo's A-series and F-series are known for offering impressive features at competitive prices. The Oppo F15 and A91 are two popular contenders in the budget smartphone arena. But with similar specs, which one truly delivers the best value?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo F15 and A91 are remarkably similar, sharing the same chipset and charging speed. The F15 often edges out slightly due to potentially better software optimization and design refinements, making it a marginally better choice for most users, though availability and price will be key factors.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, January 16. Released 2020, January | 2019, December 20. Released 2019, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771V Helio P70 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6771V Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, 50% in 30 min | 20W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Lightening Black, Unicorn White | Lightening Black, Unicorn White, Blazing Blue, Red |
| Models | CPH2001 | PCPM00, CPH2001, CPH2021 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 1.20 W/kg (head) 0.55 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F15
- Potentially better software optimization
- Slightly more modern design
- Good camera performance
- Fast charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Helio P70 chipset is aging
Oppo A91
- Competitive price
- Good value for money
- Decent camera performance
- Fast charging
- Software optimization might be slightly less refined
- Design is a bit more dated
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a Full HD+ resolution. While the specs are identical, subjective differences in color calibration and brightness might exist. The F15 often has a slightly more modern design around the display.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo F15 typically boasts a 48MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide, a 2MP macro, and a 2MP depth sensor. The A91 also has a 48MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide, a 2MP macro, and a 2MP depth sensor. Image quality is generally comparable, but the F15 might have slightly better image processing algorithms. Video recording capabilities are similar.
Performance
Powered by the Mediatek Helio P70, both devices offer adequate performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Expect smooth multitasking and responsive app loading. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal, depending on software optimization.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 4000mAh battery and support 20W fast charging, promising around 50% charge in 30 minutes. Battery life is expected to be similar, providing a full day of moderate usage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo F15 is ideal for users prioritizing a slightly more refined design and potentially smoother software experience. The Oppo A91 is a great option if you find it at a significantly lower price or if it's more readily available in your region, as the core performance is virtually identical.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are the Oppo F15 and A91 the same phone?
No, while they share many similarities like the chipset and battery, there are subtle differences in design, software optimization, and potentially camera processing.
❓ Which phone has better performance?
Real-world performance is likely very similar due to the identical chipset. Software optimization could be the deciding factor, with the F15 potentially having a slight edge.
