The Oppo F11 Pro and vivo V15 Pro were popular mid-range contenders, offering impressive features at competitive prices. Both phones boasted sleek designs and capable cameras, but which one ultimately delivers a better user experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo F11 Pro edges out the vivo V15 Pro thanks to its significantly longer battery life and superior sunlight display visibility. While the vivo V15 Pro offers slightly faster charging and a competitive chipset, the F11 Pro's endurance and screen performance make it the more practical choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - V3 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, March. Released 2019, March | 2019, February. Released 2019, March |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 76.1 x 8.8 mm (6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 157.3 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.19 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 99.7 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 18W wired, 24% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | 3700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Thunder Black, Aurora Green | Topaz Blue, Coral Red, Ruby Red |
| Models | CPH1969, CPH2209, CPH1987 | 1818, vivo 1818 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB |
Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.2dB |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 109h
|
Endurance rating 92h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1392:1 (nominal), 2.987 (sunlight) |
Contrast ratio: infinite, 3.806 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 80dB
|
Voice 65dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 83dB
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 150218 (v7)
GeekBench: 6020 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 180774 (v7)
GeekBench: 6527 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.2dB |
| Battery (old) | Endurance rating 109h | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1392:1 (nominal), 2.987 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: infinite, 3.806 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 80dB | Voice 65dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 83dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 150218 (v7)
GeekBench: 6020 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 180774 (v7)
GeekBench: 6527 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F11 Pro
- Exceptional battery life
- Excellent sunlight display visibility
- Sleek design
- Good value for money
- Slightly older chipset
- Charging speed could be faster
vivo V15 Pro
- Slightly faster performance
- Good camera software
- Modern design
- Faster charging
- Shorter battery life
- Sunlight visibility not as good as F11 Pro
Display Comparison
Both phones feature Super AMOLED displays, but the Oppo F11 Pro boasts a contrast ratio of 1392:1 (nominal) and an impressive 2.987 in sunlight readability, while the vivo V15 Pro claims an 'infinite' contrast ratio and a 3.806 sunlight rating. While 'infinite' is a marketing term, the vivo V15 Pro's sunlight performance is noticeably better. The F11 Pro's display is vibrant and sharp, but the vivo V15 Pro's slightly improved outdoor visibility gives it a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a triple-lens rear camera setup. While specific megapixel counts are not provided, both offer versatile photography capabilities. The vivo V15 Pro's camera software often delivers more vibrant and saturated images, while the Oppo F11 Pro tends to produce more natural-looking photos. Low-light performance is comparable on both devices.
Performance
The vivo V15 Pro utilizes a Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 chipset built on an 11nm process, offering a slight performance advantage over the Oppo F11 Pro's Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 (12nm). Both phones feature octa-core CPUs, but the Snapdragon 675 generally handles demanding tasks and multitasking more smoothly. However, for everyday use, the difference is minimal.
Battery Life
This is where the Oppo F11 Pro truly shines. Its endurance rating of 109h significantly surpasses the vivo V15 Pro's 92h. This translates to noticeably longer battery life for the F11 Pro, easily lasting a full day and a half or even two days with moderate usage. The vivo V15 Pro offers 18W wired charging with a 24% charge in 15 minutes, which is faster than the F11 Pro's 20W charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo F11 Pro? Users prioritizing battery life and outdoor visibility. Who should buy the vivo V15 Pro? Those seeking slightly faster performance and a more modern design, and who appreciate quicker charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
The vivo V15 Pro generally offers slightly better performance due to its Snapdragon 675 chipset, but the difference is not significant for everyday use.
❓ Is the Oppo F11 Pro's battery life really that good?
Yes, the Oppo F11 Pro's battery life is exceptional, easily lasting a full day and a half or more with moderate usage.
