The Oppo F11 Pro and vivo V11 (V11 Pro) were popular mid-range contenders, offering sleek designs and competitive features. But which one truly delivers the better experience? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and overall value to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo F11 Pro edges out the vivo V11 (V11 Pro) thanks to its superior battery life and slightly better sunlight display performance. While both offer solid value, the F11 Pro's endurance and screen visibility give it a slight advantage for everyday use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - V3 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, March. Released 2019, March | 2018, September. Released 2018, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 76.1 x 8.8 mm (6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 157.9 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.22 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 156 g (5.50 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.41 inches, 100.9 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.8", dual pixel PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.8", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | 3400 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Thunder Black, Aurora Green | Starry Night, Dazzling Gold, Nebula, Supernova Red |
| Models | CPH1969, CPH2209, CPH1987 | 1804, 1806, 1814, PD1813F_EX, V1814A |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.13 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB |
Noise -92.7dB / Crosstalk -92.1dB |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 109h
| Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1392:1 (nominal), 2.987 (sunlight) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.113 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 80dB
|
Voice 70dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 150218 (v7)
GeekBench: 6020 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
GeekBench: 5535 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB | Noise -92.7dB / Crosstalk -92.1dB |
| Battery (old) | Endurance rating 109h | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1392:1 (nominal), 2.987 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.113 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 80dB | Voice 70dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 150218 (v7)
GeekBench: 6020 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | GeekBench: 5535 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F11 Pro
- Excellent battery life
- Better sunlight display visibility
- Slightly smoother performance
- Stylish design
- Older chipset
- Camera performance not top-tier
- May feel bulky to some
vivo V11 (V11 Pro)
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- Compact design
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Shorter battery life
- Lower sunlight display visibility
- Older chipset
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The vivo V11 boasts an 'infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term), but the Oppo F11 Pro's measured contrast ratio of 2987:1 in sunlight is notably better, making it easier to view in bright conditions. The vivo V11's nominal contrast ratio is also listed as 'infinite', which is not a standard measurement.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is comparable, with both phones offering decent image quality in good lighting. Low-light performance is a weakness for both, but the F11 Pro might have a slight edge due to its image processing. Video recording capabilities are standard for the time, with both offering 1080p recording.
Performance
The Oppo F11 Pro's Mediatek Helio P70 chipset generally provides smoother performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming compared to the vivo V11's Snapdragon 660. While both are octa-core processors, the Helio P70's architecture and slightly newer manufacturing process (12nm vs 14nm) contribute to its edge. However, both phones will show their age in 2024.
Battery Life
The Oppo F11 Pro shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 109 hours, significantly outperforming the vivo V11's 98 hours. This translates to noticeably longer usage between charges.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo F11 Pro? Users prioritizing long battery life and comfortable outdoor visibility. Who should buy the vivo V11 (V11 Pro)? Those seeking a slightly more compact design and a vibrant display, though at the expense of battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Oppo F11 Pro's Helio P70 generally offers slightly better gaming performance than the vivo V11's Snapdragon 660, though both are best suited for casual gaming.
❓ Are these phones still worth buying in 2024?
Both phones are quite old now. While they can still function for basic tasks, newer phones offer significantly better performance, camera quality, and software support. Consider them only if you find them at a very low price.
