The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F11 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A70s were key contenders. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A70s edges out the Oppo F11 Pro thanks to its more modern chipset and faster charging. However, the F11 Pro boasts exceptional sunlight display visibility and impressive battery endurance. Ultimately, the A70s provides a smoother, more future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - V3 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, March. Released 2019, March | 2019, September. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 76.1 x 8.8 mm (6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 164.3 x 76.7 x 7.9 mm (6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified) |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Thunder Black, Aurora Green | Prism Crush Red, Prism Crush White, Prism Crush Black |
| Models | CPH1969, CPH2209, CPH1987 | SM-A707F, SM-A707FN, SM-A707GM, SM-A707MN, SM-A7070, SM-A707W |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.42 W/kg (head) 1.48 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB | - |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 109h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1392:1 (nominal), 2.987 (sunlight) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 80dB
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 150218 (v7)
GeekBench: 6020 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB | - |
| Battery (old) | Endurance rating 109h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1392:1 (nominal), 2.987 (sunlight) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 80dB | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 150218 (v7)
GeekBench: 6020 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo F11 Pro
- Exceptional sunlight display visibility
- Outstanding battery life (109h endurance)
- Good selfie camera
- Stylish design
- Older chipset (Helio P70)
- Slower charging (20W)
- Potentially less versatile camera system
Samsung Galaxy A70s
- More modern and efficient chipset (Snapdragon 675)
- Faster charging (25W)
- Vibrant Super AMOLED display
- Samsung's brand reliability
- Sunlight display visibility not as good as F11 Pro
- Battery life slightly shorter than F11 Pro
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large, vibrant displays. The Oppo F11 Pro's contrast ratio is impressive (1392:1 nominal, 2.987 in sunlight), particularly excelling in direct sunlight. The Galaxy A70s has a Super AMOLED display, offering richer colors and deeper blacks, but may not match the F11 Pro's sunlight performance. Both have similar resolutions, around 1080p.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective. The Oppo F11 Pro is known for its selfie camera, often praised for its beauty mode and detail. The Galaxy A70s likely offers a more versatile camera system with potentially better low-light performance due to its newer sensor technology and image processing. Both phones offer decent video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A70s holds a clear advantage here. Its Snapdragon 675 chipset (11nm) is more modern and efficient than the Oppo F11 Pro's Mediatek Helio P70 (12nm). This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better overall responsiveness. While the F11 Pro's CPU is Octa-core, the Snapdragon 675's architecture is more optimized.
Battery Life
The Oppo F11 Pro shines in battery life, boasting an incredible endurance rating of 109 hours. The Galaxy A70s, while still offering good battery life, doesn't quite reach the same level. However, the A70s supports 25W fast charging, significantly reducing charging times compared to the F11 Pro's 20W wired charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo F11 Pro? Users prioritizing exceptional sunlight readability and long battery life, and who are comfortable with a slightly older chipset. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A70s? Those seeking a smoother performance, faster charging, and the reliability of the Samsung brand.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Samsung Galaxy A70s is the better choice for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 675 chipset.
❓ Does the Oppo F11 Pro have a headphone jack?
Yes, the Oppo F11 Pro includes a 3.5mm headphone jack.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung generally provides longer software update support than Oppo, making the Galaxy A70s a more future-proof option.
