Oppo consistently delivers stylish and feature-packed smartphones. The F11 Pro and Reno2 F are two popular contenders, both offering compelling specs at competitive prices. But which one truly comes out on top? This comprehensive comparison will help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo F11 Pro edges out the Reno2 F due to its significantly better battery life and superior sunlight display performance. While both share a similar chipset, the F11 Pro's overall package provides more value, especially for users prioritizing longevity and outdoor visibility.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - V3 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, March. Released 2019, March | 2019, August 28. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 76.1 x 8.8 mm (6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 162.4 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6771V Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.3", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 20W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 350 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 14 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Thunder Black, Aurora Green | Sky White, Lake Green |
| Models | CPH1969, CPH2209, CPH1987 | CPH1989 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 340 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB | - |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 109h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1392:1 (nominal), 2.987 (sunlight) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 80dB
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 150218 (v7)
GeekBench: 6020 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB | - |
| Battery (old) | Endurance rating 109h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1392:1 (nominal), 2.987 (sunlight) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 80dB | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 150218 (v7)
GeekBench: 6020 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo F11 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (109h endurance)
- Excellent sunlight display visibility
- Versatile camera system
- Stylish design
- Good value for money
- Chipset is not the latest generation
- Charging speed is relatively slow (20W)
- May lack some of the latest software features
Oppo Reno2 F
- Slightly more modern design
- Potentially improved selfie camera
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Good display quality
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Lower sunlight display contrast
- Similar chipset to F11 Pro, offering minimal performance gains
- 20W charging
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch AMOLED display, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. However, the F11 Pro boasts a significantly higher contrast ratio in direct sunlight (2.987 vs. likely lower on the Reno2 F, based on typical Reno series performance), making it easier to view outdoors. The F11 Pro also has a slightly better nominal contrast ratio (1392:1).
Camera Comparison
The F11 Pro typically features a versatile triple-camera setup (main, ultrawide, depth sensor) while the Reno2 F has a quad-camera setup (main, ultrawide, mono, depth). While specs can be deceiving, the F11 Pro often delivers slightly better overall image quality in various lighting conditions. The Reno2 F may have a slightly improved selfie camera, but this is a marginal difference.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Mediatek Helio P70 chipset with an Octa-core CPU. Performance will be very similar in everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Don't expect flagship-level performance from either device, but they are capable for their price range. The Reno2 F might have slightly optimized software, but the difference will be minimal.
Battery Life
This is where the F11 Pro truly shines. It boasts an exceptional endurance rating of 109 hours, significantly outperforming the Reno2 F. The Reno2 F's battery life is respectable, but not in the same league as the F11 Pro.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo F11 Pro? Users seeking exceptional battery life, a vibrant display with excellent sunlight readability, and a well-rounded experience. Who should buy the Oppo Reno2 F? Those prioritizing a slightly more modern design and potentially a better selfie camera (though this is marginal) and are less concerned about battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno2 F worth buying if I already have an Oppo F11 Pro?
Unless you specifically need the slightly updated design or a marginally better selfie camera, the Reno2 F doesn't offer enough improvements to justify an upgrade from the F11 Pro, especially considering the significant battery life difference.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
Both phones offer similar gaming performance due to the same chipset. Don't expect to play demanding games at high settings on either device.
