Oppo's F-series has consistently delivered stylish phones with impressive features at competitive prices. The Oppo F11 Pro and F9 (often referred to as F9 Pro) were popular choices, but which one offers the better overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo F11 Pro edges out the F9 thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset (Helio P70 vs P60), resulting in a smoother experience. Both offer excellent displays and battery life, but the F11 Pro's improved performance makes it the preferred choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - all versions |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - V3 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, March. Released 2019, March | 2018, August. Released 2018, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 76.1 x 8.8 mm (6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 156.7 x 74 x 8 mm (6.17 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, ColorOS 7.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 16 MP, f/1.8, 1/3.1, 1.0µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Thunder Black, Aurora Green | Sunrise Red, Twilight Blue, Starry Purple, Jade Green |
| Models | CPH1969, CPH2209, CPH1987 | CPH1823, CPH1881, CPH1825 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB |
Noise -92.8dB / Crosstalk -92.1dB |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 109h
|
Endurance rating 94h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1392:1 (nominal), 2.987 (sunlight) |
Contrast ratio: 1814:1 (nominal), 3.069 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 80dB
|
Voice 71dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 81dB
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 150218 (v7)
GeekBench: 6020 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
GeekBench: 5673 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 6.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB | Noise -92.8dB / Crosstalk -92.1dB |
| Battery (old) | Endurance rating 109h | Endurance rating 94h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1392:1 (nominal), 2.987 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: 1814:1 (nominal), 3.069 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 80dB | Voice 71dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 81dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 150218 (v7)
GeekBench: 6020 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | GeekBench: 5673 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 6.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F11 Pro
- Slightly better performance (Helio P70)
- Excellent display with good contrast
- Long battery life
- Stylish design with gradient finish
- Camera performance not significantly better than F9
- Pop-up camera mechanism can be prone to issues over time
Oppo F9 (F9 Pro)
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- Long battery life
- Competitive price (especially now)
- Stylish design
- Slightly less powerful chipset (Helio P60)
- Performance can lag with demanding tasks
- Pop-up camera mechanism can be prone to issues over time
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with a resolution of 1080 x 2340. The F9 boasts a slightly higher nominal contrast ratio (1814:1 vs 1392:1) and marginally better sunlight visibility (3.069 vs 2.987), suggesting a potentially brighter and more vibrant viewing experience, though the difference is subtle. Both have waterdrop notches.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature dual rear camera setups. While specific megapixel counts are not provided, both are capable of producing good quality photos and videos in various lighting conditions. The F11 Pro likely benefits from the more powerful image signal processor (ISP) within the Helio P70, potentially leading to slightly better image processing and low-light performance. Both have a front-facing camera with a pop-up mechanism.
Performance
The F11 Pro holds a clear advantage here. It's powered by the Mediatek Helio P70, a step up from the F9's Helio P60. This translates to better overall performance, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming capabilities. Both have 8GB of RAM, but the P70's CPU architecture provides a noticeable boost.
Battery Life
Battery life is a strong point for both devices. The F11 Pro has a slightly better endurance rating (109h vs 94h), suggesting it will last a bit longer on a single charge. Both support 20W fast charging, allowing for relatively quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo F11 Pro? Users prioritizing performance and a slightly more modern design. Who should buy the Oppo F9 (F9 Pro)? Those seeking a great value option with a vibrant display and long battery life, especially if they find it at a significantly lower price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo F11 Pro worth the extra money compared to the F9?
If performance is a priority, then yes. The F11 Pro's Helio P70 offers a noticeable improvement. However, if you're on a tighter budget and primarily need a phone for everyday tasks, the F9 remains a solid option.
❓ Are the pop-up cameras reliable on these phones?
Pop-up cameras can be susceptible to dust and damage over time. While Oppo has implemented safeguards, it's a potential concern to be aware of. Handle with care.
