Oppo Ace2 vs Xiaomi Poco F4: A Detailed Showdown

The smartphone market is brimming with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we're pitting two strong contenders against each other: the Oppo Ace2 and the Xiaomi Poco F4. Both offer impressive specs and features, but which one truly comes out on top?

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Poco F4 edges out the Ace2 thanks to its slightly more powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset, brighter display, and excellent battery life. While the Ace2 boasts faster charging, the Poco F4 provides a more well-rounded experience for the price.

PHONES
Phone Names	Oppo Ace2	Xiaomi Poco F4

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41
5G bands	1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
	CDMA2000 1xEV-DO	-

Launch
Announced	2020, April 13. Released 2020, April 20	2022, June 23
Status	Discontinued	Available. Released 2022, June 27

Body
Build	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back
Dimensions	160 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.34 in)	163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	186 g (6.56 oz)	195 g (6.88 oz)
	-	IP53, dust and splash resistant

Display
Protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size	6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio)	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ)	AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)	Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)	Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
GPU	Adreno 650	Adreno 650
OS	Android 10, ColorOS 7.1	Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO

Memory
Card slot	No	No
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM	128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
	UFS 3.0	UFS 3.1

Main Camera
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad	48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lenses	-
Triple	-	64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video	4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS	4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps

Selfie camera
Features	HDR	-
Single	16 MP, f/2.4, 29mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm	20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	No
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers	Yes, with stereo speakers
	-	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD	5.2, A2DP, LE
Infrared port	-	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Battery
Charging	65W wired, 100% in 30 min 40W wireless, 100% in 56 min 10W wireless reversed	67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min
Type	Li-Po 4000 mAh	Li-Po 4500 mAh

Misc
Colors	Aurora Silver, Moon Rock Grey, Fantasy Purple	Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green
Models	PDHM00	22021211RG, 22021211RI
Price	About 520 EUR	₹ 16,999

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 101h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-26.1 LUFS (Good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

OUR TESTS
Battery (old)	-	Endurance rating 101h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	1003 nits max brightness (measured)
Loudspeaker	-	-26.1 LUFS (Good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Oppo Ace2

Incredibly fast charging (65W wired, 40W wireless)
Sleek and premium design
Good performance with Snapdragon 865

Battery life not as impressive as Poco F4
Display not as bright as Poco F4
Availability may be limited in some regions

Xiaomi Poco F4

Excellent performance with Snapdragon 870
Bright and vibrant display (1003 nits)
Outstanding battery life (101h endurance)
Competitive price

Design may be less premium than Ace2
Charging speed slightly slower than Ace2

Display Comparison

The Poco F4 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1003 nits, significantly brighter than the Ace2. While the Ace2's display is good, the Poco F4's higher brightness makes it more visible in direct sunlight. Both offer smooth 120Hz refresh rates for fluid scrolling and gaming.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is a complex area. Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Poco F4 likely has a slight edge in overall image quality due to software optimization and potentially better sensors. Both offer good video recording capabilities. Detailed camera comparisons would require extensive testing.

Performance

The Poco F4's Snapdragon 870 offers a slight performance advantage over the Ace2's Snapdragon 865. While both are capable of handling demanding games and multitasking, the 870 generally provides smoother performance and better efficiency. The Poco F4's CPU clock speeds are also marginally higher.

Battery Life

The Poco F4 shines in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 101 hours – a truly impressive figure. The Ace2's battery is respectable, but doesn't match the Poco F4's longevity. However, the Ace2's 65W wired charging and 40W wireless charging offer significantly faster top-ups.

Buying Guide

The Oppo Ace2 is ideal for users prioritizing incredibly fast charging and a sleek design. The Xiaomi Poco F4 is a better choice for those seeking top-tier performance, a vibrant display, and exceptional battery endurance without breaking the bank.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone is better for gaming?

The Xiaomi Poco F4 generally offers slightly better gaming performance due to its Snapdragon 870 chipset.

❓ Is the Oppo Ace2 worth it if I need fast charging?

Yes, the Oppo Ace2's charging speeds are significantly faster than the Poco F4, making it a good choice if that's your top priority.

❓ Which phone has better camera quality?

While both have capable cameras, the Poco F4 likely offers slightly better overall image quality due to software optimization and potentially better sensors.