Oppo Ace2 vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a streamlined experience, the Oppo Ace2 emerges as the winner. Its 65W wired and 40W wireless charging significantly outperform the Mi 10 Pro's 50W and 30W respectively, offering substantial time savings. While the Mi 10 Pro boasts a slightly better endurance rating, the Ace2's charging advantage is more impactful for daily use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Ace2 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 Sub6 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 13. Released 2020, April 20 | 2020, February 13. Released 2020, February 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) | 162.5 x 74.8 x 9 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Triple-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lenses | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, 5x hybrid zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 29mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 30 min 40W wireless, 100% in 56 min 10W wireless reversed | 50W wired, PD3.0 30W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora Silver, Moon Rock Grey, Fantasy Purple | Alpine White, Solstice Grey |
| Models | PDHM00 | M2001J1G |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 930 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 595246 (v8) GeekBench: 3331 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Ace2
- Blazing-fast 65W wired charging
- Competitive 40W wireless charging
- Faster reverse wireless charging (10W)
- Camera specifications are unknown
- Display details are limited
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G
- High peak display brightness (858 nits)
- Good battery endurance (101h)
- Potentially more advanced camera system
- Slower wired and wireless charging speeds
- Lower reverse wireless charging speed (5W)
Display Comparison
Both phones utilize high-quality displays, but the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro edges out the Ace2 with a measured peak brightness of 858 nits. While the Ace2’s display specs aren’t provided, the Mi 10 Pro’s high brightness ensures excellent visibility in direct sunlight. The Mi 10 Pro also boasts an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. However, without knowing the Ace2’s panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming rate), a definitive judgment on display quality is difficult. The Mi 10 Pro’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The context data for both phones only states 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specifics on sensor size, aperture, or OIS. Given Xiaomi’s historical focus on camera innovation, the Mi 10 Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. However, without concrete specifications, this remains speculative. The absence of detail on the Ace2’s camera suggests it may be a less prominent selling point compared to the Mi 10 Pro.
Performance
Both the Oppo Ace2 and Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+), featuring the same octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). This means raw processing power will be nearly identical. Performance differences will likely stem from thermal management and software optimization. The Ace2’s faster charging could indirectly improve sustained performance by allowing for more frequent top-ups, preventing the battery from being deeply discharged, which can impact CPU throttling. Without detailed thermal testing data, it’s difficult to declare a clear performance winner.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 101 hours, indicating a respectable battery life. However, the Oppo Ace2’s charging capabilities are the standout feature. Its 65W wired charging can fully charge the battery in just 30 minutes, while the 40W wireless charging takes 56 minutes. In contrast, the Mi 10 Pro’s 50W wired (with PD3.0) and 30W wireless charging are significantly slower. This difference in charging speed is a major advantage for the Ace2, especially for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery. The 10W reversed wireless charging on the Ace2 also surpasses the Mi 10 Pro’s 5W offering.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Ace2 if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds available, both wired and wireless, and value a phone that minimizes downtime. It's ideal for power users who frequently top up their battery throughout the day. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G if you prioritize a slightly longer battery endurance rating and potentially a more mature software ecosystem, and are less concerned with achieving the quickest possible charge times.