Oppo Ace2 vs LG G8X ThinQ: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Ace2 takes the lead with its significantly faster charging, more powerful Snapdragon 865 chipset, and overall modern features. However, the LG G8X ThinQ's dual-screen design and exceptional battery endurance offer a unique appeal for users prioritizing productivity and longevity. It's a close call, but the Ace2 edges out the G8X.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Ace2 | LG G8X ThinQ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 1960/75 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 13. Released 2020, April 20 | 2019, September 06. Released 2019, November 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) | 159.3 x 75.8 x 8.4 mm (6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | OLED, HDR10 |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual-SIM model |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 9mm (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Single | - | 3.15 MP, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 29mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio 24-bit/192kHz audio recording Tuned by Meridian Audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | - | HTML, Adobe Flash |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 30 min 40W wireless, 100% in 56 min 10W wireless reversed | 21W wired, PD, QC3 9W wireless |
| Talk time | - | Up to 12 h (multimedia) |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora Silver, Moon Rock Grey, Fantasy Purple | New Aurora Black |
| Models | PDHM00 | LMG850EMW, LM-G850, 901LG, LM-G850N |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 560 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.12 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.90 W/kg (head) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 111h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 339726 (v7), 411980 (v8) GeekBench: 11251 (v4.4), 2870 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| OUR TESTS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery (old) | - | Endurance rating 111h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | 603 nits max brightness (measured) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 339726 (v7), 411980 (v8) GeekBench: 11251 (v4.4), 2870 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Ace2
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Modern design and features
- Likely superior camera performance
- Battery life not as impressive as G8X
- May lack some of the G8X's unique features
LG G8X ThinQ
- Exceptional battery life (111h endurance)
- Unique dual-screen design for multitasking
- Good camera performance
- Older Snapdragon 855 chipset
- Slower charging speeds
- Outdated design compared to modern phones
Display Comparison
The Oppo Ace2 likely boasts a vibrant AMOLED display with a high refresh rate (assumed, based on typical Ace series features), offering smoother visuals. The LG G8X ThinQ has a respectable 603 nits brightness and an infinite contrast ratio, but its single display lacks the immersive experience of a modern AMOLED. The G8X's dual-screen setup is a unique selling point, allowing for enhanced multitasking.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Oppo Ace2 likely has a more modern sensor and image processing capabilities. While the G8X ThinQ's camera is still good, the Ace2's likely delivers better low-light performance and more detailed images. Specific camera specs are needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Oppo Ace2's Snapdragon 865 is noticeably faster and more efficient than the LG G8X ThinQ's Snapdragon 855. This translates to snappier app loading, smoother gaming, and better overall responsiveness. The Ace2's 7nm+ process also contributes to improved power efficiency.
Battery Life
The LG G8X ThinQ shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 111 hours is exceptional, significantly outperforming what we'd expect from the Oppo Ace2. While the Ace2's 65W charging is incredibly fast, the G8X's battery simply lasts much longer between charges.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Ace2 is ideal for power users, gamers, and anyone who values rapid charging and top-tier performance. The LG G8X ThinQ is a great choice for multitaskers, productivity enthusiasts, and those seeking a long-lasting battery and a unique dual-screen experience, despite its age.