Oppo Ace2 vs Huawei P40 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Flagship Trade-offs

Released in different eras, the Oppo Ace2 and Huawei P40 Pro+ represent distinct approaches to the flagship smartphone. The Ace2, leveraging the Snapdragon 865, prioritizes raw performance and charging speed, while the P40 Pro+ focuses on a refined camera system and a premium display experience. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide which device best suits your needs in today's market.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user seeking a balance of performance and value, the Oppo Ace2 emerges as the winner. Its significantly faster 65W wired and 40W wireless charging, coupled with the Snapdragon 865's robust performance, outweigh the P40 Pro+'s camera advantages for most users, especially considering current pricing.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Ace2 Huawei P40 Pro+
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41
5G bands1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -
Launch
Announced2020, April 13. Released 2020, April 202020, March 26
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2020, June 06
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frameGlass front, ceramic back, ceramic frame
Dimensions160 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.34 in)158.2 x 72.6 x 9 mm (6.23 x 2.86 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight186 g (6.56 oz)226 g (7.97 oz)
 -IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5-
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)1200 x 2640 pixels (~441 ppi density)
Size6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.58 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ)OLED, 90Hz, HDR10
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Kirin 990 5G (7 nm+)
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G76 MP16
OSAndroid 10, ColorOS 7.1Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services
Memory
Card slotNoNano Memory (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 3.0UFS 3.0
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLeica optics, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lenses50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/4.4, 240mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 40 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), 1/1.54", PDAF TOF 3D, (depth)
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720@7680fps, 1080p@960fps, HDR; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single16 MP, f/2.4, 29mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF IR TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)
Video1080p@30fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes
 -32-bit/384kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.1, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassInfrared Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging65W wired, 100% in 30 min 40W wireless, 100% in 56 min 10W wireless reversed40W wired 40W wireless 27W reverse wireless
TypeLi-Po 4000 mAhLi-Po 4200 mAh
Misc
ColorsAurora Silver, Moon Rock Grey, Fantasy PurpleWhite Ceramic, Black Ceramic
ModelsPDHM00ELS-N39, ELS-AN10
PriceAbout 520 EURAbout 1000 EUR
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 95h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -27.4 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 529687 (v8) GeekBench: 3203 (v5.1) GFXBench: 31fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Oppo Ace2

  • Significantly faster wired and wireless charging
  • Stronger GPU performance for gaming
  • Potentially better value for money

  • Camera likely inferior to P40 Pro+
  • Battery capacity unknown

Huawei P40 Pro+

  • Excellent camera system and image quality
  • Bright and vibrant display
  • Efficient Kirin 990 5G chipset

  • Slower charging speeds
  • Potential software limitations (no GMS)
  • May be more expensive

Display Comparison

The Huawei P40 Pro+ boasts a display capable of reaching 760 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Ace2’s display specs aren’t provided, the P40 Pro+'s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. However, without knowing the Ace2’s panel technology (OLED vs LCD) or color accuracy, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner based on display alone. The P40 Pro+'s brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use.

Camera Comparison

The Huawei P40 Pro+ is renowned for its camera capabilities, though specific sensor details are missing. Its strength lies in its image processing and overall camera system design. The Ace2’s camera specs are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given Huawei’s historical focus on camera innovation, the P40 Pro+ likely holds an advantage in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions and zoom capabilities. The P40 Pro+'s video recording capabilities are also likely superior, benefiting from advanced stabilization and processing algorithms. We'll assume the Ace2 has a standard flagship camera setup, but it's unlikely to match the P40 Pro+'s dedicated imaging prowess.

Performance

The Oppo Ace2’s Snapdragon 865 5G chipset, built on a 7nm+ process, delivers strong performance thanks to its octa-core configuration featuring a prime Cortex-A77 core clocked at 2.84 GHz. The Huawei P40 Pro+ utilizes the Kirin 990 5G, also on a 7nm+ node, but its CPU architecture (2x Cortex-A76, 2x Cortex-A76, 4x Cortex-A55) is slightly different. While clock speeds are comparable, the Snapdragon 865 generally exhibits superior GPU performance, making the Ace2 the better choice for demanding mobile games. Thermal management is a key consideration; the Snapdragon 865, while powerful, can generate heat, but the Ace2’s cooling solution (not specified) will be crucial. The Kirin 990 5G is known for being relatively efficient, potentially leading to less throttling under sustained load.

Battery Life

Both devices boast an endurance rating of 95 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Ace2). However, the charging speeds are where the Ace2 truly shines. Its 65W wired charging can fully charge the battery in just 30 minutes, while the 40W wireless charging takes 56 minutes. The P40 Pro+ offers 40W wired and wireless charging, but it’s significantly slower. The Ace2 also features 10W reverse wireless charging, while the P40 Pro+ offers 27W, providing a more substantial power boost to other devices.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo Ace2 if you need blazing-fast charging, prioritize gaming performance, and want a phone that can keep up with a demanding lifestyle. Buy the Huawei P40 Pro+ if you are a photography enthusiast who values image quality above all else, and are willing to accept slower charging speeds and potential software limitations due to the lack of Google Mobile Services.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Kirin 990 5G in the P40 Pro+ suffer from significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While the Kirin 990 5G is an efficient chipset, it can still experience throttling under sustained heavy load. However, Huawei implemented cooling solutions to mitigate this. The Snapdragon 865 in the Ace2 is also prone to throttling, but the extent depends on Oppo’s thermal design, which isn't detailed in the provided specs.
❓ How does the lack of Google Mobile Services (GMS) on the Huawei P40 Pro+ impact the user experience?
The absence of GMS means you won't have direct access to Google apps like the Play Store, Gmail, or YouTube. Huawei's AppGallery and Huawei Mobile Services (HMS) are alternatives, but app availability is limited. Sideloading apps is possible, but can be less convenient and potentially pose security risks.
❓ Is the 40W wireless charging on both phones truly comparable, or does the Ace2's 65W wired charging make it a better overall charging solution?
While both support 40W wireless charging, the Ace2's 65W wired charging is a game-changer. It significantly reduces charging times, making it ideal for users who need a quick power boost. The P40 Pro+'s 40W wired charging is still respectable, but it's considerably slower.
❓ Given the age of both devices, are software updates still being actively provided?
Software update support is limited for both devices at this point. Oppo typically provides a few years of updates, and Huawei's support is further complicated by the GMS situation. Expect limited or no major Android version updates.