Oppo A98 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A98 edges out the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G thanks to its faster 5G connectivity, slightly more efficient chipset (6nm vs 8nm), and significantly faster charging. While the Redmi Note 12 Pro offers a solid experience, the A98 provides a more modern and performant package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A98 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, March 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 19 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 201.8 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 700 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min | 67W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Dreamy Blue | Star Blue, Graphite Gray, Polar White, Ice blue |
| Models | CPH2529 | 2209116AG, 2209116AG |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 150 EUR |
Oppo A98
- Faster 5G Connectivity
- More Efficient Chipset (6nm)
- Significantly Faster Charging (67W)
- Modern Design
- Potentially less versatile camera system
- Software experience may vary
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
- Potentially better camera hardware
- Reliable 4G performance
- Established Xiaomi ecosystem
- Slower performance compared to A98
- Less efficient chipset (8nm)
- No 5G connectivity
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely AMOLED or IPS LCD) with a refresh rate around 120Hz. The Oppo A98 might have a slightly brighter display, but this can vary. Screen size is likely in the 6.6-6.7 inch range for both. Resolution will likely be FHD+.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G often boasts a more versatile camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and additional lenses like ultrawide or macro. However, Oppo's image processing can be competitive. Real-world camera performance will depend on software optimization and specific sensor capabilities.
Performance
The Oppo A98's Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) generally offers better performance and efficiency than the Redmi Note 12 Pro's Snapdragon 732G (8nm). The 695's newer architecture and smaller process node contribute to this advantage. Expect smoother multitasking and gaming on the A98.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a battery capacity around 5000mAh. However, the Oppo A98's 67W charging is significantly faster than the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G's 67W charging, allowing for much quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A98 is ideal for users prioritizing 5G connectivity, fast charging, and a smoother overall experience. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G is a good choice for those who primarily need a reliable 4G phone and value a potentially better camera system (depending on specific models and software optimization).