Oppo A98 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 12 Pro edges out the Oppo A98 thanks to its superior display brightness, slightly faster charging, and generally better endurance rating. While the A98 has a capable chipset, the Redmi Note 12 Pro offers a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A98 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 19 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Dreamy Blue | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | CPH2529 | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | About 290 EUR | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490526 (v9) GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A98
- Fast 67W Charging
- Smooth 5G Connectivity
- Decent Performance for the Price
- Lower Display Brightness
- Less Premium Build
- Slightly Shorter Battery Life
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Brighter and Higher Contrast Display
- Longer Battery Life
- Slightly Faster Charging
- Potentially Better Camera Software
- Slightly Higher Price
- Dimensity 1080 can throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display (890 nits vs. Oppo A98's estimated 480-500 nits), making it easier to view content outdoors. While both offer good color accuracy, the Redmi Note 12 Pro's contrast ratio (infinite) suggests deeper blacks and better overall image quality. The A98's display is perfectly adequate, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro takes the lead here.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro likely has a slight edge due to Xiaomi's generally strong camera software optimization. While specific megapixel counts are not the sole determinant of image quality, the Redmi Note 12 Pro's image processing algorithms are often praised. The A98's camera is still very good, offering detailed photos in good lighting conditions.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the Oppo A98 is a solid performer for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. The Dimensity 1080 in the Redmi Note 12 Pro offers a slight performance advantage, particularly in graphics-intensive applications. Both chipsets are built on a 6nm process, ensuring decent efficiency. However, the Redmi Note 12 Pro's CPU architecture (Cortex-A78 cores) provides a noticeable boost.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 97 hours and an active use score of 12 hours and 8 minutes. The Oppo A98's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the Redmi Note 12 Pro's longevity. Both offer 67W fast charging, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro charges slightly faster (50% in 15 min vs 18 min).
Buying Guide
The Oppo A98 is a good choice for users prioritizing a smooth 5G experience and fast charging on a tighter budget. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is ideal for those who value a vibrant display, long battery life, and a slightly more premium feel, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.