Oppo A98 vs Oppo Reno8: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 edges out the A98 with its faster charging, potentially better camera capabilities, and more refined design. However, the A98 provides excellent value with its Snapdragon 695 chipset and competitive price, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A98 | Oppo Reno8 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2022, July 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 19 | Available. Released 2022, July 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Dreamy Blue | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black |
| Models | CPH2529 | CPH2359 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 105h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.7 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 619610a (v9) GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A98
- Fast 67W Charging
- Affordable Price
- Decent Performance for the Price
- 5G Connectivity
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Likely IPS LCD Display
- Potentially Less Advanced Camera
Oppo Reno8
- Faster 80W Charging
- Premium Design
- Potentially Superior Camera
- Excellent Battery Life
- Likely AMOLED Display
- Higher Price
- Dimensity 1300 can throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays, but the Reno8's 633 nits brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor visibility. The Reno8's 'infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term) suggests deep blacks, while the A98's display is expected to be good but not exceptional. Resolution and panel type (likely AMOLED on the Reno8 and IPS LCD on the A98) will also impact the viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo/Video' capabilities, the Reno8 is expected to have a more advanced camera system. The Reno8 likely features better image processing and potentially more versatile lens options. The A98's camera is likely adequate for casual photography but won't match the Reno8's capabilities.
Performance
The Reno8's Dimensity 1300 generally outperforms the Snapdragon 695 in benchmarks and real-world usage. The Dimensity 1300's Cortex-A78 cores offer a significant performance boost for demanding apps and games. The A98's 6nm process is efficient, but the Reno8's chipset is simply more powerful.
Battery Life
The Reno8's endurance rating of 105h is exceptionally high, suggesting excellent battery life. The A98's battery capacity is likely comparable, but the Reno8's power efficiency and optimized software contribute to its superior longevity. The Reno8's 80W charging is significantly faster than the A98's 67W.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A98 is ideal for users seeking a reliable, affordable 5G phone with fast charging and decent performance for everyday tasks. The Oppo Reno8 is a better choice for those prioritizing a premium design, faster charging speeds, and potentially superior camera quality, and are willing to spend a bit more.