Oppo A98 vs Oppo F11 Pro: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A98 wins on performance and charging speed thanks to its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and 67W SuperVOOC charging. However, the F11 Pro boasts exceptional sunlight display visibility and a longer-lasting battery (though older tech). It depends on your priorities: speed vs. endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A98 | Oppo F11 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - V3 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2019, March. Released 2019, March |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 19 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 161.3 x 76.1 x 8.8 mm (6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Dreamy Blue | Thunder Black, Aurora Green |
| Models | CPH2529 | CPH1969, CPH2209, CPH1987 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 320 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1392:1 (nominal), 2.987 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 150218 (v7) GeekBench: 6020 (v4.4) GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A98
- Faster Performance (Snapdragon 695)
- 67W SuperVOOC Charging
- 5G Connectivity
- Likely Improved Camera Quality
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life than F11 Pro
- May be more expensive
Oppo F11 Pro
- Exceptional Sunlight Display Visibility
- Long Battery Life (109h Endurance)
- Generally More Affordable (due to age)
- Slower Performance (Helio P70)
- 20W Charging
- No 5G
- Older Technology
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch display, but the F11 Pro's contrast ratio (1392:1 nominal, 2.987 in sunlight) is particularly impressive, offering excellent visibility even in bright conditions. The A98 likely has a slightly more modern panel, potentially with better color accuracy, but the F11 Pro's sunlight performance is a standout.
Camera Comparison
While both offer Photo/Video capabilities, the A98 likely has a more modern camera sensor and image processing algorithms, resulting in better image quality, especially in low light. The F11 Pro's camera was respectable for its time, but the A98 should offer a noticeable upgrade.
Performance
The Oppo A98's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset is significantly more powerful than the F11 Pro's Helio P70. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A98. The A98 also supports 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the F11 Pro.
Battery Life
The F11 Pro's endurance rating of 109 hours is remarkable, showcasing its efficient power management. However, the A98's 67W charging significantly reduces charging time, allowing you to quickly top up the battery when needed. While the F11 Pro lasts longer, the A98 charges much faster.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A98 is ideal for users who prioritize smooth performance for gaming and multitasking, and appreciate fast charging. The Oppo F11 Pro is a good choice for those who value long battery life, excellent outdoor display visibility, and a more budget-friendly price point (given its age).