Oppo A98 vs Oppo F11: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A98 is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster processor, 5G connectivity, and incredibly fast 67W charging. While the F11 offers a sleek design and decent performance for its time, the A98's modern features and superior speed make it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A98 | Oppo F11 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2019, March. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 19 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 162 x 76.1 x 8.3 mm (6.38 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Dreamy Blue | Flourite Purple, Marble Green, Jewelry White |
| Models | CPH2529 | CPH1913, CPH1911 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo A98
- Faster Processor (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- 5G Connectivity
- 67W Fast Charging
- Modern Design
- Likely better camera performance
- Potentially higher price
- May lack some features of higher-end phones
Oppo F11
- Sleek Design
- Affordable (especially if found used)
- Decent Performance for basic tasks
- Outdated Processor (Helio P70)
- No 5G
- Slow 20W Charging
- Older Camera Technology
Display Comparison
The Oppo A98 likely features a more modern display technology (likely AMOLED or IPS LCD with a higher refresh rate) compared to the F11's LCD panel. Expect better color accuracy, contrast, and potentially smoother scrolling on the A98. Screen size and resolution are likely similar, around 6.5 inches with Full HD+ resolution.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer multiple rear cameras, the A98's newer chipset and potentially updated camera sensors should result in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Expect improved dynamic range and more accurate colors from the A98. The F11's camera is still capable, but noticeably behind.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the Oppo A98 is a substantial upgrade over the Helio P70 in the F11. The A98 offers significantly faster processing speeds, better multitasking capabilities, and improved gaming performance. The 6nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have similar battery capacities (around 4000-5000mAh). However, the Oppo A98's 67W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 50% in just 18 minutes, while the F11's 20W charging takes considerably longer.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A98? Users prioritizing performance, 5G connectivity, and fast charging. Who should buy the Oppo F11? Budget-conscious users who value a sleek design and don't need the latest features, and are okay with slower charging and older technology. It's a good option if you find it at a heavily discounted price.