Oppo A98 vs Oppo A9x: A Head-to-Head Budget Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A98 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, significantly faster charging (67W vs 20W), and more modern features make it a superior choice despite potentially a slightly higher price. The A9x remains a decent option if found at a deeply discounted price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A98 | Oppo A9x |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2019, May. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 19 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 162 x 76.1 x 8.3 mm (6.38 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6771V Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Dreamy Blue | Meteorite Black, Ice Jade White |
| Models | CPH2529 | PCEM00 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Oppo A98
- Faster Performance (Snapdragon 695)
- 67W Fast Charging
- 5G Connectivity
- Likely Better Display
- Improved Camera Performance
- Potentially Higher Price
- Design may be less unique
Oppo A9x
- Lower Price (potentially)
- Decent Battery Life
- Reliable Performance for Basic Tasks
- Slower Performance (Helio P70)
- Slow 20W Charging
- Older Technology
- Likely Inferior Display
Display Comparison
The Oppo A98 likely features a more modern display panel (likely AMOLED or a higher quality IPS LCD) with a potentially higher refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz) compared to the A9x's likely standard LCD. Expect better color accuracy and smoother scrolling on the A98. Screen size and resolution are likely similar, around 6.5 inches and FHD+.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely offer a multi-lens camera setup, the A98's newer chipset and potentially improved image processing algorithms should result in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Expect improved dynamic range and detail in photos from the A98. Specific megapixel counts are likely comparable.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the Oppo A98 offers a substantial performance advantage over the Helio P70 in the A9x. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the A98. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a similar battery capacity (around 5000mAh). However, the A98's 67W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in under an hour, while the A9x's 20W charging takes considerably longer.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A98? Users prioritizing performance, fast charging, and 5G connectivity. Who should buy the Oppo A9x? Budget-conscious buyers who find it at a significantly lower price and don't need the latest features or fastest charging.