Oppo A98 vs Oppo A78: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A98 takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster charging (67W vs 33W) and a more powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset. While the A78 offers a decent experience, the A98's performance and charging speed provide a noticeable edge for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A98 | Oppo A78 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | IP54 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, January 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 19 | Available. Released 2023, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Panda glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min | 33W wired, PD, 52% in 30 min, 100% in 67 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Dreamy Blue | Glowing Black, Glowing Purple |
| Models | CPH2529 | CPH2483, CPH2495 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | € 188.99 / $ 102.92 / ₹ 16,290 |
Oppo A98
- Faster Charging (67W)
- More Powerful Processor (Snapdragon 695)
- Potentially Better Image Processing
- 5G Connectivity
- May be slightly more expensive
- Design might be less refined than A78
Oppo A78
- More Affordable
- Slightly more compact design (potentially)
- Reliable Battery Life
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Less Powerful Processor (Dimensity 700)
- Potentially less refined camera performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.72-inch display, likely with an LCD panel and a resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. While specific display technologies (like refresh rate) aren't explicitly listed, the A98 might offer slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to its newer chipset and potential panel upgrades. Expect similar viewing experiences overall.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo A78 typically features a 50MP main camera, while the A98 is expected to have a similar or slightly improved main sensor. Both likely include ultrawide and macro lenses. Image quality will be comparable in good lighting conditions, but the A98's more powerful processor could lead to better image processing and low-light performance.
Performance
The Oppo A98's Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (6nm) provides a clear performance advantage over the A78's MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Snapdragon 695 generally handles multitasking and gaming more efficiently. Expect smoother app launches and less lag on the A98.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a 5000mAh battery. However, the A98's 67W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the A78's 33W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A98 is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and smoother performance for everyday tasks and light gaming. The Oppo A78 is a good choice for those seeking a reliable and affordable phone with a focus on battery life and a slightly more compact design.